Teams

Sultans of Swing

2025 55 & Over Mixed · 7.0 55 & Over Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-09vs Montana/Ruthruff 55& Over MXLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrenda Culver / Bill Wilcox vs Richard Schaub / Terri Ruthruff1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Vernon / Tom Young vs Troy Bean / Jan Schweitzer2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRita Meyer-lott / Glenn Moffatt vs Brian Clifton / Lori Abbott0-6, 3-6
2025-11-09vs GF LobbersLost 12
L#1 DoublesRita Meyer-lott / Glenn Moffatt vs Rex Derr / Marianne Derr5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBill Wilcox / Becky Wilcox vs Douglas Ormseth / Kelly McCulloch6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrenda Culver / Robert Leaverton vs Bryan Lockerby / Diane Larsen2-6, 1-6
2025-11-08vs GF LobbersWon 30
W#1 DoublesBecky Wilcox / Bill Wilcox vs Rex Derr / Marianne Derr6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTom Young / Paula Vernon vs Bryan Lockerby / Diane Larsen6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRita Meyer-lott / Glenn Moffatt vs Douglas Ormseth / Kelly McCulloch6-3, 6-1
2025-11-08vs Mixed SignalsLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrenda Culver / Robert Leaverton vs DIANA RAIMONDO / Rick Davis0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRita Meyer-lott / Glenn Moffatt vs Laura Toepfer / Paul Stouffer6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPaula Vernon / Tom Young vs Lori Faure / Jerry Camarillo6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Ruthruff 55& Over MX40120147
2Sultans of Swing135717121
3GF Lobbers1321020133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bill Wilcox
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Brenda Culver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Paula Vernon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Rita Meyer-lott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.65
Becky Wilcox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Glenn Moffatt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Robert Leaverton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenn Moffatt + Rita Meyer-lott134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Wilcox
16W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brenda Culver
0W–3L career · type T · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Paula Vernon
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
3.5
Rita Meyer-lott
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Becky Wilcox
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.65
Glenn Moffatt
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Leaverton
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.