Teams

Cheval / D. Agnew

2026 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over Day - Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.79 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-05vs Tampa Palms/ ShotCallers/ JangWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Yan / Bridget Erickson vs Pat Morris / Cindy Sparks2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Dietz vs Tifany Theriault6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Mary Kampsen vs Carla Chappell / Ashley Ramos2-6, 2-6
2026-05-29vs Avila Acea/ I. PetersonLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Yan / Mary Kampsen vs Monica Illas / Angela Teague3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBridget Erickson vs ALEXANDRA JENKINS4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Petti Waggoner vs Ivy Peterson / Frances Marton6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesBridget Erickson / Emily Yan vs Nancy Cavanaugh / Jessica Shea6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKatie Dietz vs Sharla Seton6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Kampsen / Cindy Bansky vs Jessica Greiwe / Kristen Wenk2-6, 3-6
2026-05-08vs HILLS/40&Over2.5W/SchweitzerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Emily Yan vs Carol Schweitzer / Laurie Daigle4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCindy Bansky vs Ashley Reiss2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Block / Elizabeth Heitner vs Susanna Bray / Julie Sugar6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-01vs River Hills CC / RoweLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Weber / Mary Kampsen vs Christine Coyle / Ann Johnston1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Petti Waggoner vs Heather Torres / Silvia Cuevas2-6, 2-6
2026-04-24vs Van Dyke Farms Tennis / S. CornellLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Bansky / Emily Yan vs Andrea Victoriano / Robin Feocco3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Dietz vs Nicole Fernandes3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBeth Block / Cheryl Bell vs Joanne Hurley / Linda Frank3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Heitner / Mary Kampsen vs Jennifer Hoecker / Lada Grandoff6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBridget Erickson vs Jacqueline Luhrs1-6, 0-6
2026-04-10vs Arbor Green/Emeralds/ LeathermanLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Petti Waggoner vs Cheryl Karsky / Stacy Leatherman6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKatie Dietz vs VEENA RAMESH4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Ingham / Beth Block vs Devon Connell / Cheri Snyder3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 40 & Over Day - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Denise Agnew
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
2.91
Elizabeth Heitner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Katie Dietz
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Barbara Ingham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.22
Maggie Lichtman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.19
Cheryl Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Petti Waggoner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.13
Dawn Kay
published 2.5
2.08
Beth Block
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Mary Kampsen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.03
Bridget Erickson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.96
Emily Yan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.90
Cindy Bansky
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.83
Linda Weber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Lichtman + Petti Waggoner3350% games+0.4% vs expected
Petti Waggoner + Katie Dietz213 matchesnot enough data
Emily Yan + Bridget Erickson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Denise Agnew
97W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
Elizabeth Heitner
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.91
Katie Dietz
10W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Barbara Ingham
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Maggie Lichtman
7W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Cheryl Bell
34W–66L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Petti Waggoner
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Dawn Kay
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Beth Block
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Mary Kampsen
4W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Bridget Erickson
4W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Emily Yan
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
2.5
Cindy Bansky
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Linda Weber
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.