Teams

Dickson/LR

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-27vs Ward/ArkadelphiaWon 21
W#1 DoublesMindy Morrell / Tammy Stewart vs Terry Hagood / Kim Ward6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen Dickson / Jill Bloom vs Vicky Little / B J Hampton6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLindsay Harp / Pat Forgy vs Toni Harris / Robin Terry4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-27vs Oulette/SherwoodWon 21
L#1 DoublesMindy Morrell / Tammy Stewart vs Sarah Hugen / Lissa Symancyk5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPat Forgy / Jill Bloom vs Kelly Oulette / Dena Wenzler2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaureen Dickson / Schelle Fike vs Belinda Brolo / Anne Hawkins6-2, 6-2
2025-09-26vs Roehrenbeck/LRLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsay Harp / Pat Forgy vs Diane Bischof / Karen Demott6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMindy Morrell / Tammy Stewart vs Kathy Henson / Judith Dugan3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Dickson / Schelle Fike vs Melanie Riley / Leigh Wendlandt2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-26vs Wisdom/Weigand/FSWon 21
L#1 DoublesSchelle Fike / Maureen Dickson vs Glenda Weigand / Liza Holman5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPat Forgy / Lindsay Harp vs Janice Wisdom / Debbie Southerland6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMindy Morrell / Tammy Stewart vs Meg Canfield / Sally Simon6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Lindsay Harp
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Mindy Morrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Schelle Fike
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Maureen Dickson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Pat Forgy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Sheree Meyer
published
3.09
Jill Bloom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Pricilla Backus
published
2.96
Mary Bennett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Forgy + Sheree Meyer4255% games+3.8% vs expected
Pat Forgy + Lindsay Harp4450% games−0.2% vs expected
Schelle Fike + Maureen Dickson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Harp
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Mindy Morrell
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Schelle Fike
16W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Maureen Dickson
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Pat Forgy
14W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Sheree Meyer
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jill Bloom
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Pricilla Backus
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Mary Bennett
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.