Teams

Deercreek - Korsog

2022 Duval Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-21vs Oakbridge - BinacoLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Bernard / Victor Engelhardt vs Nicole Cassel / John Baldwin2-6, 1-6
2022-07-15vs Magnolia Point - CaileLost 01
L#1 DoublesVictor Engelhardt / Donna Bernard vs Otis Duncan / Nikki Warner1-6, 4-6
2022-06-10vs Julington Creek - QuantLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Bernard / Victor Engelhardt vs Gabriel Quant / Simona Gavaller5-7, 0-6
2022-06-08vs JBTC Castaways - OhmerWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Bernard / Victor Engelhardt vs Linda Valinho / Henry Blackstock7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-06vs Jax Beach TC - De AngelisLost 01
L#3 DoublesVictor Engelhardt / Donna Bernard vs Nolan Bomar / Terri Whitson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Donna Bernard
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.05
Krishna Venkatrama
published
2.83
Alisa Blanchard
published 3
2.70
Victor Engelhardt
published
2.50
Jillian Bonventre
published
Julie Korsog
published
Julie Krey
published
Lane Lowry
published
Olga Mosteller
published
Reba Shrewsbury
published
Scott Larochelle
published
William Olson
published
William Shrewsbury
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Olson + Stephanie Engelhardt123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Engelhardt + Victor Engelhardt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Donna Bernard
63W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
Krishna Venkatrama
4W–19L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Murali Vadakkemadhom
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Alisa Blanchard
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Victor Engelhardt
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Gaspare Bonventre
0W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Jillian Bonventre
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Korsog
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Krey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lane Lowry
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Olga Mosteller
9W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Reba Shrewsbury
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Larochelle
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Engelhardt
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Olson
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Shrewsbury
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.