Teams

LA - Court Jesters

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - LA · LA - Women 4.0 WD

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-31vs LA - Mountain GatorsLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmy Hasquet vs Sharon Monempour3-6, 1-6
2024-05-29vs LA - AmazeballsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Hasquet / Kara Salmonson vs Joanna Morley / Jennifer Lichtman3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBetty Shalom / Elizabeth Lurie vs Lara Fermanis / Kristina Stonebreaker6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-05-23vs LA - MulhollandWon 20
W#2 DoublesBetty Shalom / Elizabeth Lurie vs Carolyn Prousky / Jennifer Gruskoff6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSatoko Suzuki / Amy Hasquet vs Ann Epstein-Cohen / Samira Sizdahkhani6-3, 6-3
2024-05-23vs LA - The Dream TeamWon 10
W#3 DoublesBetty Shalom / Casondra Ruga vs Rae Bochco / Leah Lavin7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-17vs LA - Century CityLost 01
L#2 DoublesBetty Shalom / Satsuki Yamashita vs Jessica Hoffman / Claire Weis2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCasondra Ruga / Betty Shalom vs Brigitte Champion / Gloria Ziperovich4-6, 3-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Casondra Ruga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Satsuki Yamashita
published
3.72
Kelly Moss
published
3.63
Lisa Licht
published
3.62
Helena Schwartz
published 4
3.57
Amy Hasquet
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Betty Shalom
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.49
Rachel Werner
published
3.48
Kara Salmonson
published
Elizabeth Lurie
published
Gail Schirm
published
Satoko Suzuki
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betty Shalom + Casondra Ruga9361% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Moss + Satsuki Yamashita224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Hasquet + Betty Shalom033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Casondra Ruga
166W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
Satsuki Yamashita
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Kelly Moss
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Lisa Licht
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Helena Schwartz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Amy Hasquet
92W–169L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Betty Shalom
121W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.56
Rachel Werner
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
Kara Salmonson
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.48
Elizabeth Lurie
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gail Schirm
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Satoko Suzuki
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.