Teams

Wu

2026 Auburn USTA 18 & Over Combo · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-27vs NolinLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnnie Kirkland / Annagail Holton vs Ann Bergman / Mary Wade6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJo Frinak / Victoria Green vs Cameran Williams / Belinda Russell2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMadison Sowden / Isabel Rubin vs Whitney Davis / Sara Nolin4-6, 1-6
2026-08-20vs NolinWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Sowden / Isabel Rubin vs Michelle Crisler / Sara Nolin6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnnie Kirkland / Kate Irwin vs Whitney Davis / Teddy Dubose6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMunkyung Kim / Victoria Green vs Robin Weyant / Mary Wren6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Annie Kirkland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Jo Frinak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Munkyung Kim
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Kate Irwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Isabel Rubin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Heidi Hulon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Madison Sowden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Victoria Green
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Annagail Holton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Starr Daniels
published
2.52
Kate Wu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Mihee Park
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Green + Annie Kirkland5058% games+5.9% vs expected
Starr Daniels + Annagail Holton404 matchesnot enough data
Victoria Green + Jo Frinak134 matchesnot enough data
Munkyung Kim + Kate Irwin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annie Kirkland
80W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Jo Frinak
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Munkyung Kim
66W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Kate Irwin
34W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.13
Isabel Rubin
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Heidi Hulon
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Madison Sowden
2W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
Victoria Green
65W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.01
3
Annagail Holton
22W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Starr Daniels
11W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.75
Kate Wu
15W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
0%43%57%
2.52
Mihee Park
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.