Teams

Peeler/HSV

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-27vs Mabry/LRLost 12
W#1 DoublesTracy Vickery / Patti Peeler vs Brenda Riley / Kathleen Brown7-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Hibbs / Sharon Cherrnay vs Becky Marks / Ruth Narveson0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Wilmot / Kathy MacQueen vs Ruth Mabry / Cathy Green3-6, 3-6
2025-09-27vs Zapp/Bella VistaLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaula Hibbs / Kimberly Vineyard vs Sheila Lienhart / Lisa Cloeter0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Cherrnay / Ann Wilmot vs Julie Bothwell / Diana Laningham3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Vickery / Kathy MacQueen vs Deborah Cooper / Barbara Barron6-2, 6-3
2025-09-27vs Dill/NLRLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharon Cherrnay / Kimberly Vineyard vs Sharon Adkins / Dena Wenzler4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Vickery / Patti Peeler vs Susan Coleman / Janie Calvert7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathy MacQueen / Paula Hibbs vs Sharon Thompson / Theia Foley2-6, 1-6
2025-09-26vs Mulhollen/NLRLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatti Peeler / Tracy Vickery vs Kathy Mascuilli / Carol Stapleton6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSharon Cherrnay / Ann Wilmot vs Cynthia Glover / Robin Dehaven1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Hibbs / Kimberly Vineyard vs Joann Privitello / Alysanne Crymes2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Wilmot
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Sharon Cherrnay
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy MacQueen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Vineyard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Patti Peeler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paula Hibbs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tracy Vickery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patti Peeler + Tracy Vickery303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Wilmot
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Cherrnay
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Kathy MacQueen
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Vineyard
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patti Peeler
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Hibbs
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Vickery
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.