Teams

Vitellaro/18s/2.5/SC

2025 Man · Cov Mixed 18 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-01Won 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Bullock / Ricco Mendes vs Brittanie Stevens / William Stevens2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Haar / Louis Haar vs Paula Thomas / Keith Shepherd6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJenny Vitellaro / Ronnie Vitellaro Jr vs Camille Pagan / Kyle Pagan6-2, 6-2
2025-07-18vs Klocek/18s/2.5/PACSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJenny Vitellaro / David Whitman vs Taylor Roessler / Shashvat Doorwar3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLane Hollister / Jessica Hollister vs Elizabeth Klocek / Alexander Klocek6-3, 7-5
2025-07-12Split 11
L#1 DoublesLaura Haar / Louis Haar vs Paula Thomas / Keith Shepherd6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Bullock / Lane Hollister vs Phoebe Whealdon / Zain Kassam6-0, 6-4
2025-07-01Split 11
L#1 DoublesSoi Smith / David Whitman vs Taylor Fortune / Ryan Bailey6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Swett / Ricco Mendes vs Taylor Roessler / Eric Tagesen6-3, 6-1
2025-06-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Swett / Ricco Mendes vs Kelly Wallace / Rick Wilkins6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-07vs Klocek/18s/2.5/PACLost 03
L#1 DoublesRonnie Vitellaro Jr / Jenny Vitellaro vs Rebecca Landry / Alexander Klocek3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Whitman / Soi Smith vs Taylor Fortune / Ryan Bailey2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAlexis Vegas / Norrie Schneider vs Jennifer Steen / Andrew Steen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-05-30Won 20
W#2 DoublesJenny Vitellaro / Ronnie Vitellaro Jr vs Zain Kassam / Phoebe Whealdon6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Haar / Ricco Mendes vs Brittanie Stevens / William Stevens6-4, 6-2
2025-05-16vs Klocek/18s/2.5/PACSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLane Hollister / Jessica Hollister vs Taylor Fortune / Ryan Bailey2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Haar / Louis Haar vs Addie Troxclair / Erick Fernandes3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Klocek/18s/2.5/PAC5315922191
2Guma/18s/2.5/BC44101430232
3Vitellaro/18s/2.5/SC35111327213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alexis Vegas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
David Whitman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Feitel Sigler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Swett
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published
Jenny Vitellaro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
Jessica Hollister
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jordan Nash
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Kristen Nash
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Lane Hollister
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Haar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Louis Haar
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Norrie Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Ricco Mendes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ronnie Vitellaro Jr
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Soi Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Bullock
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Nash + Jordan Nash3353% gamesnot enough data
Jenny Vitellaro + Ronnie Vitellaro Jr2349% gamesnot enough data
Susan Bullock + Kristen Nash123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Haar + Louis Haar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alexis Vegas
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
David Whitman
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Feitel Sigler
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Swett
13W–18L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Vitellaro
24W–31L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Hollister
18W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jordan Nash
10W–15L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Nash
6W–12L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lane Hollister
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Haar
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Louis Haar
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Norrie Schneider
1W–9L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ricco Mendes
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronnie Vitellaro Jr
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Soi Smith
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Bullock
25W–47L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.