Teams

Bangtson: LifeTime

2026 Iowa Tri-Level League · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women (West)

16 players · average NTRP 3.58 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-16vs Snedegar & Hagan: LifeTimeWon 21
W#1 DoublesTina Duenow / Kelsi Cory vs Jocelyn Fink / Wendy Rickert7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAubrey Grant / Fiona Guo vs Holli Keshwani / Heidi Snedegar6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBecky Eaton / Shirley Weuve vs Jaclyn Reddy / Jinfeng Chen4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-02vs Carl: AmesWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelsi Cory / Dina Dulaney vs Emma Katubig / Angela Carl6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPam Bangtson / Joan Meek vs Mary Beth Westercamp / Hennie Baek6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Lu / Susmita Sura vs Kirsten Hauge / Summer Bao5-7, 2-6
2026-06-25vs Merfeld: DMGCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBecky Flander / Rebecca Studer vs Christi Bird / Hannah Fox6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Braden / Susmita Sura vs Brenda Klein / Mary Everett4-6, 0-6
2026-06-18vs Zinn-Burggraaf & Rice: DMGCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Studer / Becky Flander vs Jenn Willis / Cara O'Neill4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathy Fay / Sarah Graf vs Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf / Katie Ward5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShirley Weuve / Lisa Braden vs Michele Staub / Jenna Steffensmeier6-3, 7-5
2026-06-11vs Goode & Bradfield: GenesisWon 21
L#1 DoublesTina Duenow / Dina Dulaney vs Janell Kallenbach / Megan Kaufman5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCathy Fay / Aubrey Grant vs Laura Hunt / Lynae Szemplinski6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKathleen Lu / Shirley Weuve vs Val Hoefle / Kate Reis6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women (West) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Kelsi Cory
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Dina Dulaney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Rebecca Studer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Tina Duenow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Becky Flander
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Joan Meek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Sarah Graf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Aubrey Grant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Cathy Fay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Fiona Guo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Pam Bangtson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Lisa Braden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Becky Eaton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Shirley Weuve
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Kathleen Lu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Susmita Sura
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dina Dulaney + Rebecca Studer5261% games+6.6% vs expected
Rebecca Studer + Tina Duenow4161% games+6.1% vs expected
Dina Dulaney + Tina Duenow13859% games+5.1% vs expected
Sarah Graf + Shirley Weuve3258% games+2.8% vs expected
Becky Flander + Rebecca Studer231554% games−1.1% vs expected
Kathleen Lu + Shirley Weuve1534% games−14.9% vs expected
Susmita Sura + Kathleen Lu0641% gamesnot enough data
Susmita Sura + Shirley Weuve404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsi Cory
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Dina Dulaney
62W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Rebecca Studer
78W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Tina Duenow
46W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Becky Flander
103W–81L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
Joan Meek
32W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Sarah Graf
39W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Aubrey Grant
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Cathy Fay
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Fiona Guo
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Pam Bangtson
34W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Lisa Braden
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Becky Eaton
3W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.83
Shirley Weuve
28W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Kathleen Lu
21W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%55%<1%
2.52
Susmita Sura
23W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.