Teams

Mays-HPCC - 18+ 7.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-09-08vs McFarlin 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Huffines / Madison Bowen vs Shawn McFarlin / Katharina Welborn6-1, 6-0
2022-08-11vs Nundkumar - 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Huffines / Madison Bowen vs Melissa Beeson / Erin Richardson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-04vs WOMACK 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesErin Huffines / Linda Lowman vs Cindy Sumner / Debra Jessup6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
3.94
Whitney Ellis
published
3.84
Erin Huffines
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.80
Sherman Covington
published
3.80
Madison Bowen
published
3.76
Catherine Stopka
published 4
3.65
Tracy Harlan
published
3.63
Jennifer Mays
published
3.30
Katie Ballard
published
3.26
Courtney Penley
published 4
Alyce Warden
published 3.5
Brandi Jacques
published 3.5
3.19
Linda Lowman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mays + Bridget Gislimberti241259% games+9.6% vs expected
Tracy Harlan + Sherman Covington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridget Gislimberti
45W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
4.06
Whitney Ellis
49W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Erin Huffines
173W–130L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.84
Sherman Covington
14W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Madison Bowen
30W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Catherine Stopka
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Tracy Harlan
23W–22L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Jennifer Mays
70W–42L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Katie Ballard
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
4
Courtney Penley
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.26
3.5
Alyce Warden
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brandi Jacques
19W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Lowman
43W–46L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.