Teams

Greater Vallejo TA/Picone/Vallejo

2026 MIXED 65&Over · 65&Over MX6.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-26vs Green Valley CC/Kim/FairfieldLost 12
L#1 DoublesImelda Lee / Victor Zayas vs Stephen Itano / Yolanda Irigon1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarole Tarantino / Allen Sherbal vs Catalina Barajas / Francisco Barajas1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBernadette McCarthy / Matt Walsh vs Gary Matsumura / Carol Kim6-1, 6-4
2026-07-26vs Napa Valley TA/Gold/NapaWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarb D Ryan / Victor Zayas vs Catherine Hoffman / Stanley Boehm6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesImelda Lee / Christopher Picone vs Diane de Seve / Gary Soto6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBernadette McCarthy / Matt Walsh vs Nancy Tarantino / Paul Tarantino6-2, 6-1
2026-07-25vs Green Valley CC/Kim/FairfieldWon 30
W#1 DoublesBernadette McCarthy / Victor Zayas vs Catalina Barajas / Francisco Barajas6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarb D Ryan / Matt Walsh vs Carol Kim / Gary Matsumura6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesImelda Lee / Christopher Picone vs Madeleine Mulgrew / Michael Garcia6-4, 6-4
2026-07-25vs Napa Valley TA/Gold/NapaLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarole Tarantino / Allen Sherbal vs Mark Lessler / Brenda Zanassi2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesImelda Lee / Victor Zayas vs Jeff Gold / Barbara Lum6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBarb D Ryan / Matt Walsh vs Gary Soto / Diane de Seve6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 65&Over MX6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Greater Vallejo TA/Picone/Vallejo2284984
2Napa Valley TA/Gold/Napa225715108
3Green Valley CC/Kim/Fairfield225716107

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Bernadette McCarthy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Christopher Picone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Carole Tarantino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Allen Sherbal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Barb D Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Imelda Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Matt Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole Tarantino + Allen Sherbal033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bernadette McCarthy
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Christopher Picone
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Carole Tarantino
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Allen Sherbal
1W–6L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Barb D Ryan
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.63
Imelda Lee
19W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matt Walsh
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.