Teams

MPTC - Love Struck

2026 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Friday · 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-02-27vs Houstonian - Net ForceLost 04
L#1 DoublesEmily Robertson / Koryn Wright vs Alifiya Pareja / Lindsay Ward3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Markert / Lauren Hunt vs Caroline Meade / Taylor Knotts6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBecca Gips / Paola Mcmaken vs Colette Franz / Janwa Dajani1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesMelanie Steele / Tamara Woods vs Emily Rahbar-daniels / Amber Moyse0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Katherine Marshall
published
3.67
Marla Reade
published
3.56
Melanie Tantuco
published
3.53
Emily Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Mary Markert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Joanna Strachan
published
3.40
Koryn Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Carrie Field
published 3.5
3.31
Kelsey Falcone
published
3.30
Tamara Woods
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Andrea Young
published 3.5
Anna Davidson
published 3.5
3.24
Becca Gips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Sonali Morris
published
3.09
Melanie Steele
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.07
Dolly Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Paola Mcmaken
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Marshall
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Marla Reade
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Melanie Tantuco
11W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
Emily Robertson
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Mary Markert
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.47
Joanna Strachan
10W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Koryn Wright
16W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Carrie Field
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Kelsey Falcone
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.31
Tamara Woods
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.30
3.5
Andrea Young
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Anna Davidson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Becca Gips
4W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Sonali Morris
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Melanie Steele
14W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Dolly Thomas
6W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Paola Mcmaken
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.