Teams

Buckhorn Net Crashers - C. Deming

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Day - Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-15vs Hills/Farkas/40&Over3.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesAtsuko Gentz / Jesse Glassford vs Stephanie van Brocklin / Katie Tihanovich2-6, 2-6
2025-05-08vs Hunters Green - A. TroupeLost 01
L#1 DoublesAtsuko Gentz / Mary Flynn vs Lisa Bitting / Angela Troupe3-6, 4-6
2025-05-01vs HCC OVERSERVED - M. BarkettWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Flynn / Atsuko Gentz vs Tatiana Garcia / Joann Abraham7-6, 6-2
2025-04-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Flynn / Atsuko Gentz vs Katie Johnson / Jennifer Harrell6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Day - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Atsuko Gentz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Amy Porter
published 3.5
3.22
Jesse Glassford
published
3.19
Cynthia Sexton
published 3.5
3.19
Kelly Powell
published
3.14
Mary Flynn
published
3.10
Ginger Anzalone
published
2.98
Margareta Henderson
published
2.97
Carrie Deming
published 3.5
2.95
Giselle Miller
published
2.93
STEPHANIE Hardin
published
2.88
Jillian Baizan
published
2.80
2.80
Susan MOSHER
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Giselle Miller + Kelly Powell134 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Anzalone + Jesse Glassford123 matchesnot enough data
Jesse Glassford + Kelly Powell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Atsuko Gentz
38W–24L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Amy Porter
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Jesse Glassford
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Cynthia Sexton
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Kelly Powell
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Mary Flynn
8W–32L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Ginger Anzalone
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Margareta Henderson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
3.5
Carrie Deming
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Giselle Miller
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
STEPHANIE Hardin
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Jillian Baizan
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Catherine Mueller
26W–27L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Susan MOSHER
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.