Teams

Norris & Eells - Elmcrest

2022 IA 40 & Over Adult League · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.10 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-01-08vs Lu & Graf - GenesisLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Ekberg / Lindy Christensen vs Sarah Graf / Shirley Weuve5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Kemmerer vs Kathleen Lu6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLyla Schweiger / Lydia Brown vs Val Hoefle / Susmita Sura5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJulie Kramer vs Dionne Richards1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-12-04vs Christensen & Cortese - LifetimeWon 50
W#1 DoublesAndrea Norris / JENNIFER HEBERT vs Susan Christensen / Teri Everett6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Kemmerer vs Brenda Wiarda6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Renz / Elizabeth Ekberg vs Renee Kris Chamblee / Diane Cortese7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMichelle Novak vs Suzanne Graves6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLyla Schweiger / Sandra Monahan vs Lori Hanson / Salisha Jones6-1, 6-2
2021-11-06vs Flander & Jenkins - NDACLost 23
L#1 DoublesJENNIFER HEBERT / Elizabeth Ekberg vs Brenda Wichhart / Kathy Jenkins2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJennifer Kemmerer vs Jeniece Nott6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSandra Monahan / Michelle Novak vs Carla Schmidt / Sadhna Jani6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAndrea Norris vs Sonja Smith7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Bird-Hoerner / Lyla Schweiger vs Penny Raia / Christina Donelson4-6, 3-6
2021-10-23vs Baddeloo & Mullin - DMGolfWon 40
W#1 DoublesNancy Netolicky / Julie Kramer vs Janice Koder / Sonja Heying6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAnne Jasper vs Gaylyn Markowski6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Novak / Sorina Abernathey vs Brenda Klein / Cindy Baddeloo6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJennifer Kemmerer vs Michelle Mullin6-4, 6-1
2021-09-25vs VanVark - LifetimeLost 12
W#1 DoublesLindy Christensen / JENNIFER HEBERT vs Jane Terry / Candy Vandewater4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Norris vs Carolyn Camp2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLydia Brown / Sorina Abernathey vs Michelle Cownie / Eva Anderson7-5, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Jennifer Kemmerer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.44
Michelle Novak
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.31
JENNIFER HEBERT
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Nancy Netolicky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Andrea Norris
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Elizabeth Ekberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Carol Renz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Sandra Monahan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.66
Anne Jasper
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.58
Julie Kramer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.54
Lyla Schweiger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lindy Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lydia Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sorina Abernathey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JENNIFER HEBERT + Michelle Novak4160% games+13.2% vs expected
Jennifer Kemmerer + Michelle Novak10557% games+12.0% vs expected
Sandra Monahan + Andrea Norris4155% games+10.6% vs expected
Jennifer Kemmerer + JENNIFER HEBERT4159% games+10.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Ekberg + Carol Renz6450% games+0.9% vs expected
Sorina Abernathey + Sandra Monahan0633% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Ekberg + JENNIFER HEBERT123 matchesnot enough data
Sorina Abernathey + Andrea Norris033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kemmerer
60W–24L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
Michelle Novak
72W–40L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
JENNIFER HEBERT
43W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
Nancy Netolicky
39W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Andrea Norris
13W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Elizabeth Ekberg
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Carol Renz
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Sandra Monahan
16W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Anne Jasper
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Julie Kramer
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
Lyla Schweiger
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
Lindy Christensen
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lydia Brown
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sorina Abernathey
8W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.