Teams

MG- Henderson

2025 Spring USTA 18 & Over Night League - Montgomery · 4.0 Men Night

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-26vs MCC-ConeLost 12
L#1 DoublesNathan Kempter / Todd Henderson vs Paul Winn / Bobby Trott2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEduardo Mantovani Cardoso / Jae Lee vs Charlie Trotman / Greg Alford6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLance Covert / Thadeus Cacanindin vs Harrison Campbell / Travis Winn1-6, 3-6
2025-03-05vs MCC-ConeLost 13
L#1 DoublesNathan Kempter / Lance Covert vs Paul Winn / Travis Winn0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesUsman Aamir vs Jarred Kaplan2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Nettelhorst / Thadeus Cacanindin vs Brian Cone / Charlie Trotman6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlbert Smith / Edwin Hampton vs Bobby Trott / Greg Alford7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-01vs MCC-ConeLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarshall Long / Stephen Gratz vs Harrison Campbell / Greg Alford6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesZachary Hubbard vs Kenny Sands6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesOlivier Dury / Edwin Hampton vs James Armstrong / Bobby Trott7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-26vs MCC-ConeLost 13
L#1 DoublesAntonio Holmes / Marshall Long vs Greg Alford / Harrison Campbell4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTrea Blair vs Travis Winn1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEdwin Hampton / Olivier Dury vs Charlie Trotman / James Armstrong4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlbert Smith / Lance Covert vs Mark Caradori / Bobby Trott6-1, 7-6
2025-02-05vs MCC-ConeWon 40
W#1 DoublesAlbert Smith / Stephen Nettelhorst vs James Armstrong / Charlie Trotman6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesThadeus Cacanindin vs Brian Cone6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTrea Blair / Lance Covert vs Greg Alford / Jarred Kaplan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNathan Kempter vs Harrison Campbell6-4, 6-3
2025-01-29vs MCC-ConeLost 12
L#1 DoublesLance Covert / Marshall Long vs Greg Alford / Mark Caradori7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNathan Kempter vs Harrison Campbell2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Nettelhorst / Thadeus Cacanindin vs Charlie Trotman / Bobby Trott6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Stephen Nettelhorst
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Edwin Hampton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Marshall Long
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Eduardo Mantovani Cardoso
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.76
Nathan Kempter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.75
Trea Blair
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.75
Albert Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Antonio Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Todd Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Lance Covert
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.47
Stephen Gratz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Thadeus Cacanindin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Olivier Dury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Usman Aamir
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Zachary Hubbard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Albert Smith + Lance Covert3251% gamesnot enough data
Albert Smith + Stephen Gratz134 matchesnot enough data
Thadeus Cacanindin + Stephen Nettelhorst224 matchesnot enough data
Albert Smith + Stephen Nettelhorst303 matchesnot enough data
Thadeus Cacanindin + Antonio Holmes123 matchesnot enough data
Trea Blair + Lance Covert123 matchesnot enough data
Marshall Long + Eduardo Mantovani Cardoso213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephen Nettelhorst
146W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
4.05
Edwin Hampton
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Marshall Long
18W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Eduardo Mantovani Cardoso
19W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Nathan Kempter
12W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Trea Blair
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Albert Smith
21W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Antonio Holmes
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Todd Henderson
29W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Lance Covert
8W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Stephen Gratz
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Thadeus Cacanindin
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.45
Olivier Dury
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Usman Aamir
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Hubbard
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.