Teams

NITA W 40W18a TAM (Farinas)

2022 NITA2 Winter Adult 18 & Over · NITA Winter 18 & Over 4.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 4.05 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesHuan Chang / Emma Forman vs Christine Campanelli / Dawn Baumann4-6, 6-5
W#1 SinglesRuth Karakosta vs Jean Soh6-3, 5-4
W#2 DoublesKatie Wilson / Jana Dowell vs Kristine Jurczyk / Michelle Lee7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMartha Davis / Kitty Swanson vs Erica Eisner / Anna Dau2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-14Won 20
W#2 DoublesYumi Ida / Amy Goss vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Wilson / Sophia Chang Stauffer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesAshley Kaufman / Jessica Grizzell vs Cindy Bielik / Kristy Sweigard6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAli Laumann vs Meghan Jones6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCourtney Tornow / Kitty Swanson vs Kristine Lonsway / Mary Sullivan6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHuan Chang / Kayla Garcia vs Jean Ma / Melissa Maderia6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesSophia Chang Stauffer / Huan Chang vs Allison Genovese / Gretchen Langer7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Krysinski vs Tiffany Oken4-6, 4-3
W#2 DoublesRebecca Daly / Martha Davis vs Sue Keough / Martha Skryd4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Wilson / Courtney Tornow vs Teri Andersen / Katherine Knapp6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesCourtney Tornow / Rebecca Daly vs Jennifer Gaynor / Jennifer McClelland2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRuth Karakosta vs Amy Tyree6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Boduch / Kayla Garcia vs Lisa Franco / Mary Richardson-Webb6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Purcell / Yumi Ida vs Stephanie Delejewski / Wendy Pochocki6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesHuan Chang / Emma Forman vs Coko Seeberg / Tricia Dziabis6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRuth Karakosta vs Ana Chang6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMartha Davis / Kitty Swanson vs Debbie Ackerman / Colleen Chionis3-6, 5-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Goss / Rebecca Daly vs Dimitrina Schoyer / Tanja Boskovic6-4, 5-3
2022-02-05vs NITA W 40W18b Norris RC (Nagel)Won 40
W#1 DoublesJana Dowell / Katie Wilson vs Cindy Sullivan / Patricia Nelson7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAli Laumann vs Jennifer Lenahan6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMartha Davis / Kitty Swanson vs Lori Saguto / Vicki Mitchell7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAshley Kaufman / Jessica Grizzell vs Donna Matkovic / MEREDITH BETTCHER6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · NITA Winter 18 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA W 40W18a TAM (Farinas)7025310160
2NITA W 40W18b Norris RC (Nagel)61181023204
3NITA W 40W18d Heritage TC (Campanelli/Jurczyk)5224411146
4NITA W 40W18f Score (Bianchi/Knutte)43161227203
5NITA W 40W18g Naperville TC (Madura)3482041271
6NITA W 40W18c River Trails (Miller)25101838247
7NITA W 40W18e Oak Lawn RC (Gaynor)1672145297
8NITA W 40W18h Rush Copley (Stine)0742452318

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Emma Forman
published 4.5
4.21
Ruth Karakosta
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.20
Jessica Grizzell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.96
Huan Chang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.94
Sophia Chang Stauffer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Yumi Ida
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ashley Kaufman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Courtney Tornow
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Ashley Boduch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Donna Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Laura Purcell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Kitty Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Martha Davis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Rebecca Daly
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ali Laumann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jana Dowell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Krysinski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kayla Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Davis + Rebecca Daly7260% games+6.7% vs expected
Huan Chang + Sophia Chang Stauffer21958% games−2.8% vs expected
Martha Davis + Courtney Tornow6551% games−3.4% vs expected
Laura Purcell + Yumi Ida404 matchesnot enough data
Laura Purcell + Donna Wilson404 matchesnot enough data
Martha Davis + Ashley Kaufman404 matchesnot enough data
Huan Chang + Rebecca Daly303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Krysinski + Donna Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emma Forman
64W–45L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
Ruth Karakosta
80W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Jessica Grizzell
86W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Huan Chang
201W–143L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Sophia Chang Stauffer
97W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Yumi Ida
185W–161L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Ashley Kaufman
31W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Courtney Tornow
69W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ashley Boduch
51W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Donna Wilson
61W–53L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
Laura Purcell
158W–161L career · 1 line in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Kitty Swanson
46W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Martha Davis
349W–162L career · 4 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Rebecca Daly
129W–147L career · 3 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Fra Angelica Farinas- Wright
70W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ali Laumann
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jana Dowell
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Krysinski
58W–60L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kayla Garcia
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.