Teams

Crocker

2021 Circle D Tennis Club Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.71 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-06-15vs Callahan/SteinbergLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodie Phillips / Mary Jo Roberton vs Lisa Brousseau / Beth Steinberg5-7, 2-6
2021-06-15vs MacDonaldWon 10
W#1 DoublesSherry Cummings / Mary Jo Roberton vs Cintya Leveque / Debra MacDonald7-5, 6-1
2021-06-08vs Team LimeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrooke Schetgen / Kimberly Wells vs Connie Benning / Catherine Wheeler5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Roberton / Maria Woolpert vs Karen Hajj / Stephanie Porta6-3, 6-1
2021-06-03vs Callahan/SteinbergLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Schetgen / Kimberly Wells vs Beth Steinberg / Stephanie Almeida2-6, 4-6
2021-05-27vs MacDonaldWon 10
W#1 DoublesJodie Phillips / Maria Woolpert vs Kathryn Broadbent / Joanne Stine7-5, 6-2
2021-05-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesSanghee Lee / Jodie Phillips vs Bird Bishop / Melissa Lepage7-6, 6-1
2021-05-18vs Callahan/SteinbergSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrooke Schetgen / Kimberly Wells vs Leanne Glueck / Keri Teodori7-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Roberton / Maria Woolpert vs Charlene della Ratta / Peggy Koele6-1, 6-4
2021-05-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Jo Roberton / Christine Pagendarm vs Arlene McCoog / Lonnie Pera6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2021-05-11vs Team LimeWon 10
W#1 DoublesJodie Phillips / Maria Woolpert vs Stephanie Porta / Traci Spiegel2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-06vs Callahan/SteinbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Schetgen / Kimberly Wells vs Stephanie Almeida / Christine Callahan6-2, 6-2
2021-04-27Split 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Wells / Brooke Schetgen vs Lonnie Pera / Heidi Sung6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJodie Phillips / Jean Chaisson vs Evie Callahan / Donna Considine1-6, 6-7
2021-04-22vs Team LimeWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Wells / Brooke Schetgen vs Stephanie Porta / Traci Spiegel6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Pagendarm / Mary Jo Roberton vs Kerry Muneses / Annika Mergner7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Mary Jo Roberton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Kimberly Wells
published
3.64
Brooke Schetgen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Maria Woolpert
published
3.63
3.52
Eileen Dietz
published 3.5
3.49
Sanghee Lee
published
3.33
Faustina Smith-Neil
published 3.5
3.31
Tracy Flaherty
published
3.30
Jean Chaisson
published 3.5
3.13
Jodie Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Mollie Crocker
published
Loan Nguyen
published
Sherry Cummings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Jo Roberton + Christine Pagendarm4253% games+6.1% vs expected
Eileen Dietz + Jean Chaisson15363% games−1.8% vs expected
Kimberly Wells + Mary Jo Roberton3349% games−3.0% vs expected
Jodie Phillips + Mary Jo Roberton2441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Jo Roberton
144W–102L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
Kimberly Wells
7W–18L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.64
4
Brooke Schetgen
70W–75L career · 6 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
Maria Woolpert
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Christine Pagendarm
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Eileen Dietz
161W–71L career · no lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
3.52
Sanghee Lee
38W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Faustina Smith-Neil
4W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
Tracy Flaherty
12W–19L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Jean Chaisson
164W–68L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Jodie Phillips
110W–116L career · 5 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Mollie Crocker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.11
Loan Nguyen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherry Cummings
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.