Teams

Reyna

2023 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women Winter · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.30 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-05vs DUVAL - MillerLost 02
L#2 DoublesCheryl Brent / Linda Dodds vs Maryse Hotchkiss / Nancy Powell3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeigh Chak / Eileen Lombardo vs Sue Levin / Karin Fletcher1-6, 4-6
2023-03-05vs DUVAL - MillerLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeigh Chak / Linda Dodds vs Sue Levin / Melissa Glasgow1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDebbie Reyna / Amy Graham vs Lisa Miller / Connie Bones6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Cheryl Brent vs Paula Miller / Cecilia Collins0-6, 1-6
2023-03-04vs DUVAL - MillerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLeigh Chak / Debbie Reyna vs Maryse Hotchkiss / Karin Fletcher6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCheryl Brent / Linda Dodds vs Paula Miller / Cecilia Collins6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-04vs DUVAL - MillerLost 02
L#2 DoublesLeigh Chak / Debbie Reyna vs Sue Levin / Melissa Glasgow4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Dodds / Cheryl Brent vs Rebecca Sejeck / Cheryl Keller2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Cheryl Brent
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Cammie McLeod
published 4.5
4.18
Debbie Reyna
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Eileen Lombardo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Debra Bianculli
published 4
Leigh Chak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Chak + Debbie Reyna5256% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Brent + Eileen Lombardo4346% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Chak + Cammie McLeod2353% gamesnot enough data
Cammie McLeod + Cheryl Brent1437% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Chak + Eileen Lombardo134 matchesnot enough data
Cammie McLeod + Eileen Lombardo224 matchesnot enough data
Cammie McLeod + Debbie Reyna213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cheryl Brent
51W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Cammie McLeod
56W–54L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Debbie Reyna
130W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Debra Bianculli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leigh Chak
140W–143L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.