Teams

KY/LOU/NIXON/LAMPTON

2026 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER ADULT LOUISVILLE · 2.5 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-31vs KY/LOU/IVES/REDENBAUGHLost 01
L#2 SinglesBrooke Lampton vs Kelly Bax0-6, 3-6
2026-08-24vs KY/LOU/OERTHERWon 21
W#1 SinglesDelgertsetseg Batsaikhan vs Michelle Sauer7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRobin Scarbrough vs Olivia Wang6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKathy Bowles-Nesmith vs Yana Feygin0-6, 1-6
2026-08-11vs KY/LOU/IVES/REDENBAUGHWon 21
W#1 SinglesDelgertsetseg Batsaikhan vs Anne Runyon4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRobin Scarbrough vs Becky Carothers6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesKathy Bowles-Nesmith vs Simran Brar1-6, 1-6
2026-07-30vs KY/LOU/OERTHERLost 12
L#1 SinglesKim Ford vs Sara Rocke2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesRobin Scarbrough vs Yana Feygin6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesRhonda Chesser vs Olivia Wang0-6, 4-6
2026-07-24vs KY/LOU/OERTHERLost 12
L#1 SinglesRhonda Chesser vs Sophia Mistratov4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesDelgertsetseg Batsaikhan vs Michelle Sauer7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKathy Bowles-Nesmith vs Aneshia Gray3-6, 3-6
2026-07-22vs KY/LOU/IVES/REDENBAUGHWon 20
W#1 SinglesKim Ford vs Priyali Kumar6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRobin Scarbrough vs Ashley Redenbaugh6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/NIXON/LAMPTON22751297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Delgertsetseg Batsaikhan
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.55
Robin Scarbrough
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.50
Kim Ford
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.13
Rhonda Chesser
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.06
Kelly Nixon
published
2.06
Brooke Lampton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Kathy Bowles-Nesmith
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Nixon + Brooke Lampton2340% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Delgertsetseg Batsaikhan
12W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%16%84%
2.64
Robin Scarbrough
22W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%37%63%
2.55
Kim Ford
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Rhonda Chesser
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Kelly Nixon
11W–26L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Brooke Lampton
10W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Kathy Bowles-Nesmith
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.