Teams

06 June

2021 Williamsburg Refund Holding Area · Refund Holding Area

29 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refund Holding Area have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 26 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
John Pennington
published 4.5
4.00
Laurie Marshall
published
3.82
Nancy Price
published
3.77
Rob Kirkconnell
published
3.77
Sarah Capozello
published 4
3.77
Sonia Valdes
published 4
3.77
Grace Kim
published 4
3.63
Vinita Folck
published
3.46
Peggy McElgunn
published 3.5
3.44
Shannon Halter
published
3.41
Ian Shupack
published 3.5
3.41
Cynthia Dell
published 3.5
3.21
Stacy Gregor
published
3.16
Brendy Hantzes
published 3.5
3.15
Lexie Allen
published
3.09
James Skinner
published 3.5
3.07
Zinie Sampson
published
3.06
Karen Gallegos
published
3.05
Cheryl Cacciotti
published 3
3.04
Matt Brukasz
published
3.03
Sandra Savino
published 3.5
3.01
Melissa Mathe
published
2.90
Ellen Armstrong
published 3
2.76
LOUISA HARRISON
published
2.28
Sarah Icore
published 2.5
Jen Lagow
published
Joyce Howell
published
Susannah Forde
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
John Pennington
67W–79L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
4.12
Laurie Marshall
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Murugavel Chengalvarayan
304W–112L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.90
Nancy Price
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%1%99%
3.82
Rob Kirkconnell
14W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Sarah Capozello
101W–101L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Sonia Valdes
348W–174L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Grace Kim
24W–26L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Vinita Folck
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
3.63
3.5
Peggy McElgunn
144W–170L career · no lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.46
Shannon Halter
10W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Ian Shupack
14W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Cynthia Dell
68W–68L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.41
Stacy Gregor
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
99%1%<1%
3.21
3.5
Brendy Hantzes
39W–84L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
Lexie Allen
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%12%88%
3.15
3.5
James Skinner
0W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
Zinie Sampson
15W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%29%71%
3.07
Karen Gallegos
1W–12L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Cheryl Cacciotti
67W–85L career · no lines in 2021
<1%35%65%
3.05
Matt Brukasz
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Sandra Savino
43W–61L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.03
Melissa Mathe
7W–3L career · no lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Ellen Armstrong
17W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
2.90
LOUISA HARRISON
15W–17L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
2.5
Sarah Icore
46W–59L career · no lines in 2021
0%95%5%
2.28
Jen Lagow
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Joyce Howell
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susannah Forde
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.