Teams

TIA 4.5

2025 18&Over Women Day Winter · 4.5 Day

17 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-03-17vs Armonk IndoorWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica McNamara / Diane Luftig vs Fiona Strachan / Kate Jennings5-7, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLori Calat / Leah McVey vs Wenchun Wu / Francesca Silverman4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLaura Treanor Coury / Satoko Tanimoto vs Rebecca le Neve Foster / Jessica Peretta6-4, 6-4
2025-03-14vs Rye Racquet - CCLWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Fialk / Jessica McNamara vs Masami Nakazawa / Stephanie Klingsberg5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNatasha Sauerborn / Carole Allers vs Donna Morrison / Amanda Bryan6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Luftig / Selin Sagalowsky vs Jessica Ulrich / Jelena Spyropoulos6-3, 7-6
2025-03-07vs NRRC Honey DeucesWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Fialk / Marcela Castro vs Kristen Bevilacqua / Loren Dinger6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDawn Hone / Diane Luftig vs Jani Mason / Annie O'Connor3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLori Calat / Laura Treanor Coury vs Christina Bischoff / Elizabeth Smoltz6-1, 6-4
2025-02-28vs WCC: Causing a RacquetWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Fialk / Jessica McNamara vs Victoria Williams / Camilla Keighery6-4, 3-5
W#2 DoublesDiane Luftig / Selin Sagalowsky vs Roge Nesbitt / Victoria Madonna6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSatoko Tanimoto / Dawn Hone vs KATIE SCHMITZ / Anne Teillon3-6, 2-6
2025-02-14vs Grand Slam: SpindoctorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatasha Sauerborn / Carole Allers vs Jennifer Landry Le / Katherine Sun6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesXue Petrov / Lori Calat vs Heather Hecht / Meghan Martucci4-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Luftig / Satoko Tanimoto vs Tina Reid / Jill Newman6-3, 6-2
2025-02-07vs Armonk IndoorWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatasha Sauerborn / Jessica McNamara vs Sara Shapiro / Wenchun Wu6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmanda Fialk / Diane Luftig vs Francesca Silverman / Alessandra Veronesi3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Calat / Xue Petrov vs Grace Smith / Jessica Peretta6-3, 6-4
2025-01-31vs Rye Racquet - CCLLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Fialk / Natasha Sauerborn vs Karen Gill / Masami Nakazawa1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Chilton / Lori Calat vs Christie Manning / Tara Blanchard7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Luftig / Satoko Tanimoto vs Cristina Casati-Lewis / Jessica Ulrich3-6, 3-6
2025-01-24vs NRRC Honey DeucesWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Chilton / Jessica McNamara vs Kristen Bevilacqua / Loren Dinger7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Fialk / Xue Petrov vs Kimberly Mehrara / Maureen Fearon6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarole Allers / Natasha Sauerborn vs Elizabeth Smoltz / Kaitlan Cantwell6-1, 6-3
2025-01-17vs WCC: Causing a RacquetWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Chilton / Natasha Sauerborn vs Julie Anderson / Melissa Shaw6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesXue Petrov / Satoko Tanimoto vs Anne Teillon / Victoria Williams2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Hone / Veronica Coach vs Sarah Thompson / Christy Schultze3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-10vs Grand Slam: SpindoctorsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Chilton / Marcela Castro vs Emilie Chang / Lisa Kahley6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarole Allers / Jessica McNamara vs Hope Foley / Katherine Sun5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmanda Fialk / Xue Petrov vs Whitney Maurer / Katharina Lewis6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TIA 4.501018923252
2WCC: Causing a Racquet010171028259
3Grand Slam: Spindoctors010131233289
4Rye Racquet - CCL010161434274
5NRRC Honey Deuces010101940306
6Armonk Indoor01061842315

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Natasha Sauerborn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.48
Amanda Fialk
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.41
Marcela Castro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.38
Jessica McNamara
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.25
Laura Chilton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.23
Xue Petrov
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.12
Selin Sagalowsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.06
Laura Treanor Coury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Diane Luftig
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.00
Carole Allers
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
3.99
Naomi Proctor
published
3.94
Lori Calat
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.89
Veronica Coach
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.88
Lara Haffenreffer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Leah McVey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Satoko Tanimoto
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Dawn Hone
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcela Castro + Jessica McNamara5076% games+21.2% vs expected
Carole Allers + Natasha Sauerborn22265% games+11.4% vs expected
Natasha Sauerborn + Laura Chilton20165% games+9.2% vs expected
Laura Chilton + Lori Calat10164% games+9.2% vs expected
Laura Chilton + Jessica McNamara16264% games+9.1% vs expected
Xue Petrov + Laura Chilton7071% games+9.1% vs expected
Xue Petrov + Leah McVey8068% games+8.3% vs expected
Marcela Castro + Laura Chilton10160% games+8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Natasha Sauerborn
188W–57L career · 6 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.58
4.5
Amanda Fialk
76W–42L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
4.48
Marcela Castro
111W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.41
Jessica McNamara
116W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.38
Laura Chilton
190W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Xue Petrov
140W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Selin Sagalowsky
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.12
Laura Treanor Coury
67W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Diane Luftig
61W–84L career · 7 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Carole Allers
186W–140L career · 9 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
Naomi Proctor
54W–68L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.99
4.5
Lori Calat
166W–91L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Veronica Coach
148W–72L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Lara Haffenreffer
113W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
Leah McVey
139W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Satoko Tanimoto
198W–129L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Dawn Hone
224W–150L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.