Teams

BTobia (Brookhaven)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-04vs AMilas (OPRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Kimberly Stafford vs Kathy Spence / Christina Hill3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Hunter / Claudia Ridley vs Christine Shultz / Susan McGarry5-7, 4-6
2024-09-20vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesClaudia Ridley / Vanessa Pomfrey vs Maggie Webb / Carla Ackels2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGiuliana Bolanos / Laura Hunter vs Kate Schumacher / Laura Richards4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-09-13vs LJudd (Charlotte CC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLoretta Anderson / Claudia Ridley vs Bridget Browne / Rachel Lee2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Jones / Vanessa Pomfrey vs Anna Glass / Amy Moore3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKate Merrill / Brenda Tobia vs Laura Judd / Christina Burgess2-6, 3-6
2024-09-06vs KGilchrist (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesClaudia Ridley / Giuliana Bolanos vs Ashley Hall / Janet Rogers2-6, 4-6
2024-08-30vs JHerlong/LO'Callaghan (FCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKara Horiatis / Claudia Ridley vs Anne Paramore / Elizabeth Kyle6-3, 7-5
2024-08-23vs EStubbs (Charlotte CC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesGiuliana Bolanos / Claudia Ridley vs Brandon Boyd / Leigh Young2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesErin Pacilli / Brenda Tobia vs Erin Stubbs / Susan Peters6-2, 7-5
2024-08-16vs MSevigny (Carmel)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLoretta Anderson / Giuliana Bolanos vs Elizabeth Workman / Lori Anderson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVanessa Pomfrey / Claudia Ridley vs Kathryn Klaus / Stephanie Parker7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKate Merrill / Brenda Tobia vs Amy Yancey / Michele Simpson4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Giuliana Bolanos
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.29
Loretta Anderson
published
3.16
Kate Merrill
published
3.11
Claudia Ridley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.05
Suzanne Jones
published
2.98
Vanessa Pomfrey
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.88
Erin Pacilli
published
2.66
Kimberly Stafford
published
2.61
Kara Horiatis
published
2.54
Brenda Tobia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Pomfrey + Claudia Ridley11752% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Tobia + Giuliana Bolanos6165% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Tobia + Claudia Ridley4155% gamesnot enough data
Loretta Anderson + Claudia Ridley4157% gamesnot enough data
Loretta Anderson + Giuliana Bolanos404 matchesnot enough data
Kate Merrill + Suzanne Jones213 matchesnot enough data
Kate Merrill + Brenda Tobia213 matchesnot enough data
Erin Pacilli + Claudia Ridley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Giuliana Bolanos
55W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.30
Loretta Anderson
17W–16L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.29
Kate Merrill
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Claudia Ridley
89W–67L career · 7 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Suzanne Jones
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Vanessa Pomfrey
82W–94L career · 7 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
Erin Pacilli
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
2.88
Kimberly Stafford
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
0%13%87%
2.66
Kara Horiatis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Brenda Tobia
32W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.