Teams

CCC GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-01vs KC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesTonya Rasmussen / Leah Sherwood vs Sandra Copenhaver / Christine Jacquet5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKatherine Cambruzzi vs Annamaria Augustine0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJordan Arnell / Lori Cerise vs Lara Howe / Carla Minckley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-26vs SSG BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarci Fisher / Tonya Rasmussen vs Dana Gordon / Jade Sloane6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAshley Ruger vs Zhanna Jackson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Asbury / Jordan Arnell vs Sue Johnson / Therese Saurber6-0, 6-2
2022-05-18vs BCST REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLiz Miller / Tonya Rasmussen vs Kay Washburn / Ann Symalla4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLori Cerise vs Leslie Aranjo6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnn Roux / Marci Fisher vs Michelle Johnston / Laurie van Sickle7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2022-05-11vs KC YELLOWLost 12
W#1 DoublesJordan Arnell / Ashley Ruger vs Judy Delzell / Mercedes Barrs7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesLiz Miller vs Erica Smith3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarci Fisher / Ann Roux vs VIRGINIA WANG / Lori Himmel0-6, 6-7
2022-05-06vs BM BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJordan Arnell / Lori Cerise vs Theresa Fry / Laura Yetzer6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLeah Sherwood vs Minyi Du6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Roux / Jennifer Asbury vs Megan Harbaugh / Britany Borel3-6, 5-7
2022-04-27vs GR GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesTonya Rasmussen / Lori Cerise vs Nicole Bartet / Lauren Bloom4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLeah Sherwood vs Abby Letourneau4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJordan Arnell / Ann Roux vs Shannon Kelly / Sydney Green6-3, 6-2
2022-04-20vs LEBTC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Ruger / Jennifer Asbury vs LeAnn Joswick / Megan Fry2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLeah Sherwood vs Sheila Beurket5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJordan Arnell / Liz Miller vs Adrian Schwarz / Shelly Smith4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings52 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTC PURPLE7030514226
2GAC PURPLE6024618195
3BCC GOLD6130520245
4SSHP BLUE6126923250
5BM BLUE61201533265
6WC BLUE52231231305
7CVTA BLACK52201532267
8BTA ORANGE52181734274
9SS-G YELLOW52211434317
10APR BLUE52201536304
11BRMST YELLOW52191636318
12ATC GREEN43231227255
13GTC YELLOW43211431269
14WP BLACK43201532318
15KC-RH PINK43221332280
16GTC TEAL43181738320
17PRKR RED43181742313
18GTC PINK43161945333
19PTC PINK33151533254
20CHCC RED34181736297
21CVTA GOLD34161939306
22BCC PINK34181740309
23SKY GREY34171840317
24TTA GOLD34171842335
25PCC GOLD34171842326
26GR NAVY34152045362
27KNO GOLD34152045351
28SSLT GOLD24111941280
29LEBTC YELLOW25171838317
30KC-CC NAVY25161940320
31GPTC RED25161944344
32VC TEAL25152044324
33CM ORANGE25161945343
34HV SILVER25152045312
35PRKR TEAL25132245345
36CACI GREEN25142146321
37PCC SILVER25142146342
38BRMST SILVER25122350339
39CCC GREEN25102556363
40HFII ORANGE1491635248
41SSD BLUE16132248356
42CM NAVY16132248350
43SSLT MAROON16122351356
44EM YELLOW16112451367
45HIW MAROON16112451360
46TTA PINK16102551357
47CVTA NAVY16112454375
48HW YELLOW1653062388
49CVTA ORANGE07102552351
50GR SILVER0792655365
51MC NAVY0782756366
52RMTC BLACK0762958362

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Jordan Arnell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Lori Cerise
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.86
Ashley Ruger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.71
Leah Sherwood
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.38
Liz Miller
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Ann Roux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Asbury
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Katherine Cambruzzi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tonya Rasmussen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Arnell + Tonya Rasmussen303 matchesnot enough data
Leah Sherwood + Ashley Ruger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Arnell
41W–16L career · 6 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Lori Cerise
43W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Ashley Ruger
24W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Leah Sherwood
43W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Liz Miller
30W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.38
Ann Roux
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Asbury
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katherine Cambruzzi
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tonya Rasmussen
13W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.