Teams

Zimmer, City Park, N.O.

2022 NO Adult 18 & Over - Men · 4.0 NO (18&O) Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.90 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 NO (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Eli Gay
published 4.5
4.08
David Stahl
published 4
4.05
Peter Kelly
published
3.87
Pat Neely
published
3.87
John Zimmer
published
3.82
Edwin Geoghegan
published 4
3.77
Oliver Zimmer
published
3.69
Marc Jaynes
published
3.69
Nicholas Hansel
published
3.66
Nathan Zimmer
published
3.53
Alex Flores
published 3.5
3.23
Tony Paternostro
published
3.11
Dominic Ciaccio
published 3.5
Jansen Petagna
published
Julian Richards
published
Michael Paternostro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Stahl + John Zimmer4159% games−5.4% vs expected
John Zimmer + Nicholas Hansel224 matchesnot enough data
John Zimmer + Pat Neely213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eli Gay
18W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
David Stahl
45W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
4.08
Peter Kelly
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
4.05
Pat Neely
61W–44L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
John Zimmer
32W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Edwin Geoghegan
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Oliver Zimmer
13W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Marc Jaynes
24W–6L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Nicholas Hansel
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Nathan Zimmer
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Alex Flores
27W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.53
Tony Paternostro
25W–18L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Dominic Ciaccio
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.11
Jansen Petagna
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julian Richards
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Paternostro
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.