Teams

Brett Lofgren

2024 FLEX SPRING SINGLES LEAGUE - BOISE · TV

1 player · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings17 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BFitz7272466
2Cameron Conlon7272662
3Bad Tennis6363980
4Jay Dark5454864
5Jeff Pugsley5454981
6Porto54541191
7Team Tommy45451080
8Holbrook45451171
9Smack That Crap45451176
10Buffoon36361393
11Cameron L27271598
12Brett Lofgren27271596
13Get'er Done18181698
14Gary Loeb181816103
15Double Fault Dragon181816105
16Ryan Simmons181817106
17Jacob Skinner181817105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Brett Lofgren
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brett Lofgren
8W–38L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.