Teams

B13 ACAC Carter

2021 Richmond Combo Mixed · Combo Mixed 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-11-07vs B5 TDC SansomSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStephen Holahan / Jane Riddle vs Ed Ohman / Kelley Schmidt1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Jones / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Anne Sansom / Ramkripa Natarajan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-31vs B7 Woodlake RitterLost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Riddle / Mark Carter vs Patrick Urban / Mary Estes0-6, 1-6
2021-10-24vs B1 CCV AveryLost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Riddle / Greg Loomis vs Courtney Harper / Scott Harrison1-6, 1-6
2021-10-17vs B9 MTC MeyerWon 20
W#1 DoublesKyle Moore / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Craik Goodspeed / Rebekah Jamerson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Carter / Jane Riddle vs Lewis Farinholt / Robin Meyer6-3, 7-5
2021-10-13vs B6 Westwood CecilLost 02
L#2 DoublesSandra Holahan / Stephen Holahan vs Rene Philhower / Mark Reams1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Kyle Moore vs Jackson Dyer / Elizabeth Kelly0-6, 4-6
2021-10-10vs B10 MAC Talamo 7.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / John Jones vs Tanisha Moseley / Tom Rider4-6, 1-6
2021-10-03vs B11 Burkwood CarterLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Carter / Jane Riddle vs Wayne Clark / Jennifer Hughes5-7, 6-7
2021-09-12vs B2 Avalon Ghita 7.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesMark Carter / Jane Riddle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesStephen Holahan / Sandra Holahan vs Vikram Nagulan / Michele Smith1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Lee Moore
published
3.47
Sarah Estes
published
3.35
Jane Riddle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.34
Greg Loomis
published 3.5
3.23
Randolph Moore
published
3.10
Sandra Holahan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Mark Carter
published
Stephen Holahan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–167L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
Lee Moore
18W–16L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
Sarah Estes
19W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Jane Riddle
106W–67L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Greg Loomis
9W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
Randolph Moore
22W–26L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Sandra Holahan
59W–94L career · 2 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Mark Carter
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephen Holahan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.