Teams

Patty's Team

2025 B · CS Adult 40 & Over League

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · CS Adult 40 & Over League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Patty's Team000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amanda Stephenson
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
Chelsie Breaux
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.60
Lydia Sims
published
3.15
Dana Pendleton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kerri Cawley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kristen Shepperd
published
Lori Brown
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Maegan Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roxie Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Shay Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Davis + Lori Brown3351% gamesnot enough data
Shay Simpson + Roxie Johnson5073% gamesnot enough data
Shay Simpson + Dana Pendleton123 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Davis + Kerri Cawley213 matchesnot enough data
Dana Pendleton + Lori Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Stephenson
9W–2L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chelsie Breaux
13W–8L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lydia Sims
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.60
3.5
Dana Pendleton
9W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Kerri Cawley
7W–2L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Shepperd
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Brown
20W–7L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maegan Jackson
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Davis
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roxie Johnson
11W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shay Simpson
13W–11L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.