Teams

SFV Shadow's Aces

SFV-Adult 40 & Over · SFV - Women 3.5 Weekend

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesAli Laventhol / Mercedes Soriano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesAli Laventhol / Chia Chi Tsai vs Michelle Tepper / Alicia Duran6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKathleen Foy-Asaro vs Ronnie Mean6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarrie Gasper / Paula Marbach vs Tammy Scher / Priscilla Aviles7-6, 6-3
2021-08-01vs SFV Hot ShotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Sokolow / Kathleen Foy-Asaro vs Ana Calleja / Sharona Malekan1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAli Laventhol vs Angela Martinez-Lee6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Gasper / Allison Langus vs Cindy Gaytan / Andrea Kinloch4-6, 0-1
2021-07-18vs SFV Rooftop StringersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarrie Gasper / Didi Sowul vs Lisa Bourne / Bruny Haas4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAli Laventhol vs Lori Lepler6-1, 7-6
2021-07-17vs SFV Kiss My AceWon 10
W#1 SinglesKathleen Foy-Asaro vs Larissa Kazantsev6-3, 6-2
2021-07-10vs SFV Paseo TribeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPaula Marbach / Ali Laventhol vs Rocio Anderson / Deidre Hope2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Foy-Asaro / Diane Quan vs Hanan Asfoury / Janine Baker7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-13vs SFV Kiss My AceWon 20
W#1 SinglesKathleen Foy-Asaro vs Larissa Kazantsev6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Warner / Ali Laventhol vs Beatrice Haddad / Kari Shaffer6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 3.5 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Paula Marbach
published
3.28
Chia Chi Tsai
published 3.5
3.27
Susan Warner
published
3.26
Diane Quan
published 3.5
3.26
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Ali Laventhol
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Carrie Gasper
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Allison Langus
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Gasper + Kathleen Foy-Asaro181552% games+7.9% vs expected
Susan Warner + Allison Langus2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Marbach
18W–24L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Chia Chi Tsai
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
Susan Warner
18W–21L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Diane Quan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
172W–163L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Ali Laventhol
163W–119L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Carrie Gasper
189W–211L career · 5 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Allison Langus
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.