Teams

RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 18AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#2 DoublesEddy Quijada / Gary Hazard vs Ramkumar Subramanian / Laks Varathan6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Ivan Scruby
published 4
3.83
Young Min Kim
published
3.75
Daniel Ocasio
published 3.5
3.68
Salvatore Marchetti
published
3.63
Dil Chitaure
published 3.5
3.61
Marco Valgonio
published
3.59
Eddy Quijada
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
George Meskus
published 3.5
3.38
Jesse Cortes
published
3.31
Demetrius Andrews
published 3.5
3.26
Darwing Navarro
published 3.5
Barry Jarvis
published 3.5
3.24
Jean-Yves Charon
published
3.24
Stefan Moskowitz
published
3.15
Sergio Castillo
published
2.41
Garry Hurlbut
published 3
Jose Romero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Demetrius Andrews + Darwing Navarro4154% games+0.3% vs expected
Darwing Navarro + Jean-Yves Charon314 matchesnot enough data
George Meskus + Darwing Navarro303 matchesnot enough data
Demetrius Andrews + Eddy Quijada033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ivan Scruby
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Young Min Kim
44W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
3.5
Daniel Ocasio
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.75
Salvatore Marchetti
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Dil Chitaure
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.63
Marco Valgonio
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Eddy Quijada
10W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
George Meskus
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Jesse Cortes
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Demetrius Andrews
19W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Darwing Navarro
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Barry Jarvis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jean-Yves Charon
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Stefan Moskowitz
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Sergio Castillo
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Garry Hurlbut
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.41
Jose Romero
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.