Teams

UPTA18FF/Studebaker/Pavilion

2026 UPTA Fall 18 & over-Women · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA18FF/Ware/Kroc000000
2UPTA18FF/Studebaker/Pavilion000000
3UPTA18FF/Milano/Sugar Creek000000
4UPTA18FF/Morgan/GCC000000
5UPTA18FF/Weinbaum/Brookstone000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Maryteal Oneal
published
2.49
Bobbi Bateman
published 2.5
2.42
Jamie Dawson
published
2.37
Melissa Studebaker
published
Becca Wilson
published 2.5
2.24
Karen Tomforde
published
2.09
Maryn Canniff
published
1.93
Shanda Davey
published
Molly Manning
published
Tina Langley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maryn Canniff + Melissa Studebaker3742% games+8.4% vs expected
Melissa Studebaker + Maryteal Oneal6257% games+6.7% vs expected
Bobbi Bateman + Jamie Dawson134 matchesnot enough data
Bobbi Bateman + Karen Tomforde033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maryteal Oneal
23W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
2.5
Bobbi Bateman
16W–16L career · no lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Jamie Dawson
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
Melissa Studebaker
26W–25L career · no lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Becca Wilson
5W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Tomforde
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Maryn Canniff
23W–21L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Shanda Davey
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Molly Manning
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tina Langley
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.