Teams

Hanover - Staub

2026 USTA 18 & Over League · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.71 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-01vs West Shore CC - JohnstonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJustin Staub / James Wroe vs Jared Locke / Matthew Leach1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesJoshua Wayne vs Archit Reddy Gaddam1-6, 0-6
2026-06-28vs Wisehaven - LongLost 13
L#1 DoublesJustin Staub / James Wroe vs Ryan Sabados / Pearson Clary3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGreg Kline vs Rusty Mirasol2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJessy Ringquist / Toby Waters vs Gary Spangler / Jason Phillips6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAaron Pilius vs David Trimmer2-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs Messiah University - BischofLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Phillips / Chris Bouselli vs Robert Lentz / Robert Himler4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesParker Sanders vs Joshua Ringquist0-6, 0-6
2026-06-07vs West Shore CC - JohnstonLost 23
L#1 DoublesJustin Staub / James Wroe vs Ryan McFadden / Colin Flack4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGreg Kline vs Nicholas Harth6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesIan Neal / Roberto Ugarte vs Martin Lavendier / Jonathan Stough5-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAaron Pilius vs Will Johnston3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDouglas Greenholt / Scott Phillips vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-31vs Hempfield - ArtersLost 04
L#1 DoublesJustin Staub / James Wroe vs Ryan Weitzel / Noah Frace6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJessy Ringquist vs Brandon Longenecker3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesIan Neal / Toby Waters vs Jeffery Arters / Shane Burridge2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChris Bouselli / Joshua Wayne vs Steven Jeffrey / Grant Sweitzer2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesIan Neal / Justin Staub vs Kevin Rowland / Elliott Kleckner6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesGreg Kline vs Will Harriger6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesParker Sanders vs Charles Robbins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-08vs Wisehaven - LongLost 14
L#1 DoublesIan Neal / Justin Staub vs John Schmitt / Kyle Salaga2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesGreg Kline vs Dylan Ryan6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesScott Phillips / Douglas Greenholt vs Huy Nguyen / David Trimmer1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAaron Pilius vs Rusty Mirasol1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessy Ringquist / Joshua Wayne vs Jason Phillips / Gary Spangler6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hanover - Staub0561939246
2Messiah University - Bischof08231740336
3(CPD) Lebanon Valley College - Kleckner09271842377
4West Shore CC - Johnston09143170477
5Wisehaven - Long010331740374

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
James Wroe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Greg Kline
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.67
Douglas Greenholt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Justin Staub
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Parker Sanders
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.47
Scott Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Jessy Ringquist
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Joshua Wayne
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Chris Bouselli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Ian Neal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Aaron Pilius
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Roberto Ugarte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Toby Waters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberto Ugarte + Justin Staub5655% games+19.7% vs expected
James Wroe + Justin Staub0534% games−18.0% vs expected
Scott Phillips + Douglas Greenholt10555% gamesnot enough data
Ian Neal + Justin Staub224 matchesnot enough data
Roberto Ugarte + Chris Bouselli213 matchesnot enough data
Parker Sanders + Greg Kline213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Wroe
92W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Greg Kline
26W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Douglas Greenholt
126W–121L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Justin Staub
34W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Parker Sanders
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
Scott Phillips
92W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Jessy Ringquist
14W–23L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Joshua Wayne
9W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Chris Bouselli
44W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Ian Neal
17W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Aaron Pilius
5W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Roberto Ugarte
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Toby Waters
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.