Teams

AUSTIN/40/8.5/NOD/CAPS

2025 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day · 8.5 NO (40&O) Women Day

14 players · average NTRP 4.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-27vs Cordes/Kallenborn/40/8.5/NOD/NOCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesTrezmarie Zotkiewicz / Claire Lewis vs Elizabeth Wooten / Sarah Feirn2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Bravo / Rebecca Tassin vs Elizabeth Cordes / Stacy Head6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Baker / Vicky Martin vs Anne Long / Corinne Marcus6-0, 6-1
2025-10-20vs Seale/40/8.5/NOD/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Bravo / Elizabeth Stirling vs Amanda Seale / Lauren Tafaro3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDarbi Philibert / Amanda Silvey vs Jennifer Perilloux / Helene Barnett7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTrezmarie Zotkiewicz / Susan Taylor vs Stephanie Murray / Michele Carollo4-6, 3-6
2025-09-29vs BROWNE DRENNAN/40/8.5/NOD/NOLTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichele Bravo / Michelle Wagner vs Riley Kennedy / Maryanne Pranikoff3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDarbi Philibert / Elizabeth Stirling vs Michele Prokop / Claire Karas2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Baker / Trezmarie Zotkiewicz vs Amy Macdiarmid Browne / Cynthia Cook6-4, 6-4
2025-09-23vs Cordes/Kallenborn/40/8.5/NOD/NOCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Carrone / Darbi Philibert vs Kristin Blackwell / Elizabeth Wooten1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Bravo / Amanda Silvey vs Sarah Jackson / Anne Long3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesClaire Lewis / Stacey Messina vs Diane Kallenborn / Holly McKenzie Perrier6-4, 7-6
2025-09-16vs Seale/40/8.5/NOD/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenny Kennedy / Vicky Martin vs Beth Blosser / Andrea Descant5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Carrone / Darbi Philibert vs Lauren Tafaro / Amanda Seale3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichele Bravo / Elizabeth Stirling vs Stephanie Murray / Laura Dodd6-2, 6-4
2025-08-25vs BROWNE DRENNAN/40/8.5/NOD/NOLTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Baker / Michelle Wagner vs Gretchen Drennan / Claire Karas6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Bravo / Elizabeth Stirling vs Yvonne Keegan / Kathryn Talbot6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesClaire Lewis / Trezmarie Zotkiewicz vs Riley Kennedy / Maryanne Pranikoff4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 NO (40&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Claire Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Darbi Philibert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.07
Michele Bravo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Robin Austin
published
3.79
Vicky Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Trezmarie Zotkiewicz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Amanda Silvey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Michelle Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Stacey Messina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Elizabeth Stirling
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.37
Rebecca Tassin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Carrone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jenny Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Austin + Michele Bravo7259% games+2.0% vs expected
Michelle Wagner + Elizabeth Stirling4351% games−8.4% vs expected
Claire Lewis + Michele Bravo3253% games−8.9% vs expected
Claire Lewis + Trezmarie Zotkiewicz1439% gamesnot enough data
Robin Austin + Stacey Messina123 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Carrone + Trezmarie Zotkiewicz303 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Stirling + Michele Bravo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Claire Lewis
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Darbi Philibert
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
Michele Bravo
20W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Robin Austin
31W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Vicky Martin
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Trezmarie Zotkiewicz
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Amanda Silvey
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Michelle Wagner
32W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Stacey Messina
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Elizabeth Stirling
26W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Rebecca Tassin
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Elizabeth Carrone
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Kennedy
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Taylor
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.