Teams

West Homewood - Chen

2025 B'ham Fall - Adult 18 & Over Weeknight W & M · 3.0 Men - Monday

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-18vs BH - Porter/HaladwalaWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Clay / David Mayer vs Zeke Hrynkiw / Tom Williams6-1, 6-4
2024-11-04vs West Homewood - SellersWon 10
W#1 DoublesTodd Sitton / David Mayer vs John Michael Finney / Marc Dobson6-1, 6-2
2024-10-28vs Gardendale - ZassodaLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Mayer / Patrick Carey vs Forrest Fletcher / Noah Speigle6-7, 3-6
2024-10-21vs BH - Porter/HaladwalaLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Clay / David Mayer vs Tyler Hutto / Bryan Nowell2-6, 4-6
2024-09-30vs West Homewood - SellersLost 01
L#3 DoublesJonathan Chen / David Mayer vs Jonathan Walsky / Brandon Galya1-6, 5-7
2024-09-25vs Old Overton - PreskittLost 01
L#1 SinglesDavid Mayer vs Jared Cox3-6, 1-6
2024-09-11vs Riverchase - TullossLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Mayer / Patrick Carey vs Spencer Benson / Brandon Swindle5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men - Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
David Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.08
Trey Lingo
published
2.89
William Glass
published
2.88
Todd Sitton
published
2.88
Robert Clay
published
2.81
BRIAN Harris
published 3
2.75
Chris Bertrand
published 3
2.63
Gaither Horde
published
2.51
Kurt Fischer
published
Edric Williams
published
Ethan Beisher
published
Zachary Burger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kurt Fischer + BRIAN Harris213 matchesnot enough data
BRIAN Harris + Robert Clay213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Mayer
55W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Trey Lingo
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
William Glass
24W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Todd Sitton
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
Robert Clay
18W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
BRIAN Harris
18W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Chris Bertrand
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Gaither Horde
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
Kurt Fischer
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%47%53%
2.51
Edric Williams
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ethan Beisher
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Burger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.