Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/7.0/Acevedo/CCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&overMX/7.0/Lopez/EPTC#193241228303
2GEPTA/Cisneros/18&over/7.0MX93241234326
3GEPTA/18&overMX/7.0/Sampath/NMSU66181840332
4GEPTA/18&overMX/7.0/Castaneda/EPCC66171942323
5GEPTA/18&overMX/7.0/Acevedo/CCC66171943344
6GEPTA/18&overMX/7.0/Estrada/FB66181844349
7GEPTA/18&overMX/7.0/Refaeian/EPTC#301282860404

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Cynthia Canales
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.96
Carlos Reza
usually #1 Singles 27%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 3
Enrique Mata
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Gianna Acevedo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Joshua Rhoads
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Juan Acevedo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Laura Houston
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Nassar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Marcia Zaragoza
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Sara Acevedo
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Shannon Rhoads
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Tito Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Singles 18% · published
Vanessa Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Zachary Broome
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Acevedo + Enrique Mata71147% games+7.7% vs expected
Shannon Rhoads + Joshua Rhoads4349% gamesnot enough data
Gianna Acevedo + Juan Acevedo2447% gamesnot enough data
Juan Acevedo + Tito Herrera134 matchesnot enough data
Zachary Broome + Juan Acevedo213 matchesnot enough data
Sara Acevedo + Laura Houston303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Canales
24W–37L career · 27 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Carlos Reza
19W–31L career · 24 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Enrique Mata
56W–103L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gianna Acevedo
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joshua Rhoads
24W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Juan Acevedo
50W–82L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Houston
49W–21L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Nassar
60W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcia Zaragoza
36W–64L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Acevedo
18W–57L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Rhoads
36W–89L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tito Herrera
14W–51L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Herrera
47W–66L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Broome
17W–37L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.