Teams

Seminole Lake Misfits

2024 Pinellas Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 7.0 MXD

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-17vs Tarpon Spies MXDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMoise Carrington / Dale Salmon vs Marie Wagner / Britt Decker6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-03-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Barker / Maggie Berning vs Brian Kaye / Silvie Bahulova2-6, 4-6
2024-03-03vs Pinellas/Dsa/40&Over7.0MXDWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarlos Rodriguez / Maggie Berning vs Chris Maddaloni / Tisha Maddaloni7-5, 6-2
2024-02-25vs McMullen Halm XWon 20
W#1 DoublesGreg Barker / Maggie Berning vs Andrew DePasquale / Esthela Gonzalez6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDale Salmon / Moise Carrington vs Kenneth Lucas / Lita Hollister6-3, 6-2
2024-02-25vs RCSP Fantauzzo MXDWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarlos Rodriguez / Jessica Tas vs Cathrine Chin / Alan Chin7-5, 6-4
2024-02-11vs Tarpon Spies MXDWon 10
W#3 DoublesJessica Tas / Carlos Rodriguez vs Marie Wagner / John Weissler III6-3, 6-1
2024-01-28vs Pinellas/Dsa/40&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#2 DoublesGreg Barker / Maggie Berning vs Chris Maddaloni / Tisha Maddaloni0-6, 4-6
2024-01-21vs McMullen Halm XWon 10
W#2 DoublesMoise Carrington / Dale Salmon vs Ivette Arroyo / Andrew DePasquale6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MXD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Dale Salmon
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.59
Jessica Tas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.28
Jonathan Thompson
published
3.24
Diane Haymes
published 3.5
3.20
Moise Carrington
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
January Moennig
published
3.10
Rao Tilak
published
3.02
Maggie Berning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
JoAnn Lind
published
Sherrl Fry
published
Yesh Naidu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dale Salmon + Moise Carrington5163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dale Salmon
51W–42L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Jessica Tas
34W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Jonathan Thompson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Diane Haymes
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Moise Carrington
67W–71L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
January Moennig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Rao Tilak
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Maggie Berning
50W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
JoAnn Lind
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherrl Fry
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yesh Naidu
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.