Teams

Hold-credit-exp-8/1/26

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekEND · HOLD

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for HOLD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Nathan Childress
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.34
Nicholas Tracz
published
3.13
Jody Kane
published
3.02
Chandra Montero
published 3
Derek Mireles
published 3
2.36
Kate Reddy
published
Mike Averch
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathan Childress
25W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.83
Nicholas Tracz
26W–26L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Jody Kane
35W–39L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
Chandra Montero
32W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Derek Mireles
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kate Reddy
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Mike Averch
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.