Teams

RTC CAULEY

2025 FW Adult 40 & Over League - Ladies · Sunday Ladies 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-18vs TCU MCGUIRELost 02
L#1 DoublesBernestine Knight / Melinda Whitlock vs Lynn Jumper / Eva Gregory1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Ahmad / Meredith Billings vs Vona Wawryszczuk / Debra Hiler1-6, 3-6
2025-02-02vs SSP MACYLost 04
L#1 DoublesBernestine Knight / Deanna Sullivan vs Annette Baker / Jill Moore3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMarsha Scott vs Stacy Burdick6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Cauley / Jennifer Cottraux vs Joi MacY / Jennifer Crawford3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Schrengohst / Diana Ahmad vs Angela Snow / Katherine Dickinson4-6, 4-6
2025-01-12vs TCU MCGUIRELost 03
L#1 DoublesMelinda Whitlock / Bernestine Knight vs Jeanne Rodgers / Lynn Jumper0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Ahmad / Jennifer Cottraux vs Megan Bennett / Shannon Mulroy1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLaura Schrengohst / Meredith Billings vs Debra Hiler / Heidi Weaver4-6, 2-6
2024-12-22vs SSP MACYLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelinda Whitlock / Bernestine Knight vs Annette Baker / Kim Bell4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanie Garrett / Deanna Sullivan vs Angela Snow / Cecilia Gallardo Solano2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Schrengohst / Diana Ahmad vs Lola Gomez / Jennifer Crawford3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Sunday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Melinda Whitlock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Diana Ahmad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Bernestine Knight
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Jennifer Cottraux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Marsha Scott
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.89
Meredith Billings
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Deanna Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Laura Schrengohst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Joan Cauley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janie Garrett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernestine Knight + Melinda Whitlock044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melinda Whitlock
11W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
3
Diana Ahmad
27W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Bernestine Knight
26W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Jennifer Cottraux
18W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Marsha Scott
40W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Meredith Billings
9W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Deanna Sullivan
27W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Laura Schrengohst
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Joan Cauley
3W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Janie Garrett
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.