Teams

SD 4.5 Tri University City RC/ Repetti

2022 SCTA Tri-Level Doubles Summer- SD · SD Women (4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.21 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesAnastacia Blazevich / Adele Psyllos vs Carla Zarbo / Priscilla Martinez1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesSophia Richardson / Adele Psyllos vs Kortney Eng / Priscilla Martinez2-6, 3-6
2022-07-08vs SD 4.5 Tri Mountain View/ WagnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSophia Richardson / Anastacia Blazevich vs Gina Sherer / Joan Yngson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women (4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Angela Chang
published 4.5
4.22
Amy Repetti
published 4.5
4.18
Adele Psyllos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Sophia Richardson
published
3.95
Anastacia Blazevich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Stacie Hunt
published
3.81
Terri Bourne
published 4
Christine Golemb
published 4
3.36
Andrea Kerns
published
Alexandra Shubin
published 3.5
Michelle Dallal
published
Stacey Pennington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Richardson + Terri Bourne4649% games+10.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angela Chang
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Amy Repetti
92W–38L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Adele Psyllos
83W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
4.18
Sophia Richardson
27W–31L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Anastacia Blazevich
28W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.95
Stacie Hunt
19W–14L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Terri Bourne
105W–136L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Christine Golemb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Andrea Kerns
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
3.36
3.5
Alexandra Shubin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Dallal
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacey Pennington
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.