Teams

Extra Men

Other Mixed Doubles 65 & Over Adult · Extra Men

7 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Extra Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Henry Nelson
published
2.77
Stan Mastalerz
published
2.74
Frederick Matros
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.73
Jeff Pastorius
published
2.62
Juergen Mertens
published
James Simpson
published
Wen Chen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Henry Nelson
42W–31L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Stan Mastalerz
28W–35L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Frederick Matros
19W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Jeff Pastorius
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Juergen Mertens
29W–37L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
James Simpson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Wen Chen
17W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.