Teams

NewGen

2026 WINTER A18&O WEEKEND · 2026 Winter A18&O 5.0 MEN

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-03vs Racquet ClubLost 01
L#1 DoublesJack Schadek / Matthew Wareti vs Denys Alyeksyeyev / R Pepino6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-12vs WickertreeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Wareti / Jack Schadek vs Kyle Collette / Amos Allison5-7, 3-6
2026-03-20vs Racquet ClubWon 10
W#1 SinglesMatthew Wareti vs Nicholas Aronoff6-1, 6-4
2026-02-27vs Racquet ClubWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Wareti / Jack Schadek vs R Pepino / J R Pepino6-4, 6-3
2026-02-13vs WickertreeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Wareti / Brady Pema vs Grant MacPherson / Micah Scott2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 Winter A18&O 5.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Matthew Wareti
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.29
Michael Stefan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.28
Matthew Warburton
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
4.27
Jack Schadek
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
4.22
Adam Schrock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Juan Vera
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jack Schadek + Adam Schrock5349% gamesnot enough data
Jack Schadek + Michael Stefan3251% gamesnot enough data
Jack Schadek + Matthew Wareti123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Wareti
10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.41
Michael Stefan
21W–15L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
Matthew Warburton
16W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
4.28
Jack Schadek
40W–26L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
4.27
4.5
Adam Schrock
29W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Juan Vera
8W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.