Teams

Team 5

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.71 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-20vs Team 11Won 10
W#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Ann-Lee Chen vs Nicole Harlow / Tracey Benson3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-07-17vs Team 3 Springfield Summer AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Farabow / Ann-Lee Chen vs Page Coleman / Tracy McCarthy6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Cahoon vs Nicole Brown6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-13vs Team 1 ServivorsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Healy / Margarita Baldwin vs Jolyn Green / Michelle Mantey6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Cahoon vs Jessica Harris2-6, 2-6
2022-07-10vs Team 2 Hot SeatsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoanne Good / Amanda L B Ronco vs Stephanie Peebles / Alexis Martin4-6, 2-3
2022-06-27vs Team 11Won 10
W#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Amy Farabow vs Sandra Wolk / Mary Burke Fox6-4, 6-4
2022-06-25vs Team 3 Springfield Summer AcesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAmy Cahoon vs Nicole Brown6-7, 1-3
W#2 DoublesJoanne Good / Amanda L B Ronco vs Page Coleman / Alexandra Davis6-4, 3-5, 1-0
2022-06-22vs Team 1 ServivorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargarita Baldwin / Carolyn Healy vs Debra Elliott / Kristi Wean6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Margarita Baldwin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Errin Matechak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Carolyn Healy
published 4
3.35
Maureen Cook
published
3.34
Ann-Lee Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Amy Cahoon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Mary Cepko
published
3.27
Joanne Good
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Danielle Frazier
published 3.5
3.12
Maria Costea
published
Kim Monk
published
Marcia Pokrant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Cahoon + Ann-Lee Chen0627% gamesnot enough data
Marcia Pokrant + Margarita Baldwin314 matchesnot enough data
Ann-Lee Chen + Errin Matechak213 matchesnot enough data
Errin Matechak + Margarita Baldwin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Margarita Baldwin
449W–127L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Errin Matechak
176W–161L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Carolyn Healy
49W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Maureen Cook
21W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Ann-Lee Chen
216W–224L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Amy Cahoon
181W–281L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Mary Cepko
36W–28L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Joanne Good
85W–87L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Danielle Frazier
12W–20L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Maria Costea
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Kim Monk
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcia Pokrant
19W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.