Teams

FLYHS HICKERSON

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-12vs PBCP BARNHILLLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiogo Carvalho / Lacy Utterback vs Eric Copeland / Vanessa Madrid6-7, 2-6
2024-05-05vs CSRC REYNOLDSWon 10
W#1 DoublesTisha Hickerson / Jason Hickerson vs Danny Kelly / Noel Kelly6-2, 2-0
2024-04-28vs CSCC OPPENHEIMWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Hjelkrem / Tisha Hickerson vs Keith Oppenheim / Julie Davis6-0, 6-3
2024-04-21vs CSCC PEPPERWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiogo Carvalho / Lacy Utterback vs Amadee Pepper / Carol Pepper6-2, 6-4
2024-04-14vs LTFCS OSTLYLost 01
L#1 DoublesTisha Hickerson / Jason Hickerson vs Erin Reed / Gregory Tabor2-6, 2-6
2024-04-07vs CSRC SCOTTSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiogo Carvalho / Lacy Utterback vs Zach Barker / MARY SCOTT1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTisha Hickerson / Jason Hickerson vs Jennifer Gonzales / Jason Gonzales6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Ken Lane
published
3.70
Mike Hjelkrem
published
3.69
Matt Campbell
published
3.57
Diogo Carvalho
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Jason Hickerson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Tisha Hickerson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Esperanza Campbell
published
2.82
Holly Lane
published
2.22
Bill Graziano
published 2.5
Jane Roberts
published
Melissa Hjelkrem
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tisha Hickerson + Jason Hickerson16958% games+13.5% vs expected
Ken Lane + Holly Lane8360% games+11.0% vs expected
Matt Campbell + Esperanza Campbell10851% games+4.0% vs expected
Jane Roberts + Matt Campbell404 matchesnot enough data
Mike Hjelkrem + Melissa Hjelkrem134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Lane
34W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
Mike Hjelkrem
27W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Matt Campbell
32W–16L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Diogo Carvalho
55W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Jason Hickerson
58W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.47
3
Tisha Hickerson
47W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
Esperanza Campbell
34W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
Holly Lane
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
2.5
Bill Graziano
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
Jane Roberts
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Hjelkrem
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.