Teams

DO 6.5M 18 & Over (Cook)

2025 Dothan USTA Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-23vs WTC - 6.5 Combo MenWon 20
W#1 DoublesBilly Ernst / Eric Peel vs Dale Whittle / Jimmy Huynh6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Kingsbury / James Phillips vs Paul Muller II / Paul Muller6-4, 6-3
2025-09-16vs WTC - 6.5 Combo MenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDennis Leger / Justin Littles vs Paul Muller / Jimmy Huynh6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBilly Ernst / Johnny Cook vs Fidel Castillo / Colby Shimabukuro2-6, 1-6
2025-09-09vs WTC - 6.5 Combo MenWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Kingsbury / James Phillips vs Colby Shimabukuro / Justice Bull6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohnny Cook / Eric Peel vs Justin Thomley / Fidel Castillo6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBilly Ernst / Benjamin Odom vs Paul Muller II / Paul Muller6-3, 6-4
2025-08-25vs WTC - 6.5 Combo MenWon 20
W#1 DoublesBilly Ernst / James Phillips vs Paul Muller II / Paul Muller6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoseph Cason / Dennis Leger vs Jimmy Huynh / Clayton Thornton6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DO 6.5M 18 & Over (Cook)40111354
2WTC - 6.5 Combo Men0411122133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Lance Brown
published
3.35
Joseph Cason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Justin Littles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Benjamin Odom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Johnny Cook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Billy Ernst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Eric Peel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Dennis Leger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
William Kingsbury
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Billy Ernst + Dennis Leger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lance Brown
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.41
Joseph Cason
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Justin Littles
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Benjamin Odom
8W–2L career · type T · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Johnny Cook
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Billy Ernst
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.02
3
Eric Peel
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Dennis Leger
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
William Kingsbury
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.