Teams

IslandWalk Quandt

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 7.0 W Wednesday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-02vs LWN ArringtonWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Dickson / Laura Quandt vs Ana Bautista / Teri Arrington6-4, 6-4
2025-02-26vs Royal PayneLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnne McIntosh / Jane Hurman vs Jo Anne Cullen / Linda Evans6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathleen Landrein / Laura Quandt vs April Hosty / Lynn Heinz3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Sparks / Audrey Sansotta-Weiss vs Bonita Fyala / Pamela Mousseau0-6, 4-6
2025-02-19vs LBK Public GoodwinWon 10
W#3 DoublesLinda Sleet / Nancy Dickson vs Christine Goodwin / Anne White2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-12vs LBK Public AssalyWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Dickson / Linda Sleet vs Micheline Poirier / Kristy Owens4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-01-29vs LWR SteffensWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Dickson / Jane Burns vs Loel Davenport / Mary Beth Steffens6-4, 6-4
2025-01-08vs GT Bray PauleyWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Dickson / Vicki Sparks vs Catherine Bartlett / JERI STEWART6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Jane Hurman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Barbara Babb
published 3.5
Anne McIntosh
published 3.5
Audrey Sansotta-Weiss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Laura Quandt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janet McLellan
published
Kathleen Landrein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Walczak
published
Linda Sleet
published
Nancy Dickson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Vicki Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Dickson + Barbara Babb123 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Dickson + Linda Sleet213 matchesnot enough data
Laura Walczak + Jane Hurman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Hurman
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Barbara Babb
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Anne McIntosh
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Audrey Sansotta-Weiss
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laura Quandt
5W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Janet McLellan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Landrein
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laura Walczak
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Sleet
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Dickson
55W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Sparks
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.