Teams

IHCC - Hand

2025 · 2026 MATA USTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - Winter

15 players · average NTRP 3.69 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 2026 MATA USTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Becca McLeod
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.89
Haley Yarbrough
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.87
Anna Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Anna Blanche Pennington
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.71
Monica Windham
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.69
Meredith Covert
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
3.68
Kristen Prosperi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.67
Caroline Childs
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 8% · published 4
3.52
Tarver Perry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.33
Kara Alvarez
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Aimee Dasher
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.12
Mary Beth Hand
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.04
Haley Claxton
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 3
2.99
Nicole Prine
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
2.92
Anna Sharpton
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Singles 18% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Covert + Caroline Childs8157% games+4.3% vs expected
Anna Blanche Pennington + Haley Yarbrough5255% games−2.5% vs expected
Kristen Prosperi + Tarver Perry134 matchesnot enough data
Haley Claxton + Anna Sharpton404 matchesnot enough data
Anna Barnes + Caroline Childs134 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Covert + Becca McLeod404 matchesnot enough data
Haley Yarbrough + Becca McLeod314 matchesnot enough data
Haley Claxton + Kara Alvarez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Becca McLeod
38W–12L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Haley Yarbrough
39W–9L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Anna Barnes
17W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Anna Blanche Pennington
31W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Monica Windham
28W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Meredith Covert
42W–19L career · 13 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.69
Kristen Prosperi
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Caroline Childs
27W–12L career · 12 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Tarver Perry
12W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Kara Alvarez
22W–3L career · 12 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Aimee Dasher
30W–30L career · 11 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Mary Beth Hand
17W–17L career · 13 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Haley Claxton
36W–12L career · 21 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Nicole Prine
32W–23L career · 17 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Anna Sharpton
27W–23L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.