Teams

TTC- Urban

2022 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-18vs Brevard - Suntree / McLaughlinLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Ruether / Mary Beardall vs Sharon Bean / Unsuk Hurst4-6, 3-6
2022-05-16vs Rockledge - MelendezWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Beardall / Katharine Polvino vs Gisela Alcalde / Jeannette Cintron7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHeather Harris / Michelle Ruether vs Donna Paternoster / Kaitlin Stahl6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-02vs Fee - HeynWon 10
W#2 DoublesHeather Harris / Nicole Bertran vs Gena Wools / Sarah Brown6-1, 6-3
2022-04-25vs Brevard - Suntree / McLaughlinLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnna Farach / Faith Urban vs Sandra Rowe / Ann Passmore2-6, 3-6
2022-04-18vs Kiwi - RamseySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Beardall / Sara Hatfield vs Barbara Burgess / Karen Fitzmaurice1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Bertran vs Heather Boesch0-6, 3-6
2022-04-11vs Rockledge - MelendezWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Ruether / Nicole Bertran vs Suzanne Kube / Brenda Knox7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Sara Hatfield
published
3.44
Nicole Bertran
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Kristen Crisafulli
published
3.31
Heather Harris
published 3.5
3.25
Amy McIntosh
published 3.5
3.25
Michelle Ruether
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Mary Beardall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Shayna Gleckel
published
3.06
Mei Kalman
published
2.80
Karen Lee
published
2.41
Faith Urban
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Katharine Polvino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Beardall + Shayna Gleckel101054% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Bertran + Michelle Ruether4257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Hatfield
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Nicole Bertran
66W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
Kristen Crisafulli
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Heather Harris
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Amy McIntosh
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Michelle Ruether
90W–89L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Mary Beardall
95W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Shayna Gleckel
37W–35L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Mei Kalman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Karen Lee
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Faith Urban
11W–32L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.41
Katharine Polvino
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.