← Teams

VTC-Jones

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Dean Gaylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Alan Jones
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.33
Andy LaFrazia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
—
Jim Hamlik
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Frank Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.12
Ramon Tuason
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.70
Mike Olson
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.65
Todd Berinstein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-06-18Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAlan Jones / Larry Benedict vs David Hoiland / Anil Khanna7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMike Olson / Damir Lemes vs Tyler Clark / Eric Halvorson6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRamon Tuason / Andy LaFrazia vs Zack Hegge / Jeffrey Gates6-2, 6-4
2023-06-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAndy LaFrazia / Dean Gaylor vs Frank Mathews / Austin Rice-Stitt6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRamon Tuason vs Alex McIntosh6-4, 4-3
L#3 DoublesAlan Jones / Jim Hamlik vs Nate Larsen / Huy Bui6-0, 6-0
2023-06-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAndy LaFrazia / Ramon Tuason vs Ernesto Bruce / Chris Hasle3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJim Hamlik / Lee Wilcox vs MICHAEL DOHERTY / Jeremy Fields6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTodd Berinstein / Mike Olson vs Matthew Casimo / James Thomas6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-21Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesJim Hamlik / Larry Benedict vs Lei Wan / Basheer Ahmed Muddebihal6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMike Olson vs Stephen Marsh3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRamon Tuason / Dean Gaylor vs Michael Sullivan / Sid Ramachandran3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTodd Berinstein / Frank Brown vs WonKyu Kim / Atul Bhargava7-6, 6-3
2023-05-14Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAlan Jones / Andy LaFrazia vs JONGBUM PARK / Chinwoo Kim6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJim Hamlik / Daniel Gorecki vs Yong-Joon Park / John Yu6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMike Olson / Todd Berinstein vs Shik Ahn / JIN PARK7-5, 6-4
2023-05-06Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesAlan Jones / Larry Benedict vs George Scott / Jim Mounts6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRamon Tuason vs Hien Lu3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDean Gaylor / Andy LaFrazia vs Michael Jansen / Brian Cormier6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJosh Belzman / Jim Hamlik vs Jeff Gonzales / Michael Rich7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLarry Benedict / Jim Hamlik vs Michael Jansen / Hien Lu6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRamon Tuason vs Sam Jakola6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFrank Brown / Damir Lemes vs Manoj Pandya / George Scott6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2023-04-08Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAndy LaFrazia / Dean Gaylor vs Sid Ramachandran / Basheer Ahmed Muddebihal6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMike Olson vs Arjun Bilakanti6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTodd Berinstein / Frank Brown vs Lei Wan / Atul Bhargava6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Dean Gaylor
88W–63L career
12%88%1%
3.66
3.5
Alan Jones
96W–69L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
Andy LaFrazia
65W–34L career
4%86%10%
3.33
3.5
Jim Hamlik
33W–46L career
not enough data
—
3
Frank Brown
115W–69L career
0%20%80%
3.21
3.5
Ramon Tuason
59W–74L career
9%91%0%
3.12
3
Mike Olson
68W–92L career
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Todd Berinstein
18W–44L career
7%93%0%
2.65

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.