Teams

Jones

2023 CVTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Spring · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-20vs CargleWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargie DeShon / Chris Tarpley vs Charlene Mathis / Robin Sorrow6-4, 6-3
2023-05-13vs CVTA/Janice DossWon 10
W#1 DoublesRenee McClanahan / Margie DeShon vs Marsha Thompson / Sue Garland7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-06vs PooleLost 01
L#1 DoublesBonnie Burden / Margie DeShon vs Annette Poole / Nancy Carr6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2023-04-29vs CargleSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBonnie Burden / Margie DeShon vs Christie Westall / Phyllis Searles6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKim Lamb / Beth Katt vs Beth Hoyt / Pamela Locklear6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-04-22vs CVTA/Janice DossWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Lamb / Kaye Matthews vs Patti Ledbetter / Sheila Jackson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-16vs CargleWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargie DeShon / Bonnie Burden vs Leigh Kosater / Pamela Peal7-5, 7-5
2023-04-15vs PooleWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharlie Lewis / Margie DeShon vs Ann Miller / Regina Hicks7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-18vs PooleWon 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Johnson / Kim Lamb vs Rhonda Garrett / Melissa Touchstone6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kim Lamb
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Charlie Lewis
published 3.5
3.26
Renee Brown
published
3.19
Chris Tarpley
published 3.5
3.14
Renee McClanahan
published
3.13
Rebecca Camboia
published
3.09
Bonnie Burden
published 3.5
3.07
Terri Holden
published
2.67
Tina Jones
published
Margie DeShon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Lamb + Margie DeShon5258% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Camboia + Charlie Lewis3255% gamesnot enough data
Chris Tarpley + Kim Lamb224 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Camboia + Renee Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim Lamb
215W–87L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Charlie Lewis
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Renee Brown
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Chris Tarpley
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Renee McClanahan
23W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.14
Rebecca Camboia
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Bonnie Burden
17W–31L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Terri Holden
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
Tina Jones
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%12%88%
2.67
Margie DeShon
203W–156L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.