Teams

CV-Julie Vila

2026 CV Winter Flex Singles · CV-Women 4.0

1 player · average NTRP / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-09vs CV-Francoise MoranLost 01
L#1 SinglesJulie Vila vs Francoise Moran5-7, 4-6
2026-02-14vs CV-LLW-Jill MendozaLost 01
L#1 SinglesJulie Vila vs Jill Mendoza1-6, 3-6
2026-02-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJulie Vila vs Susan Brooks6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · CV-Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CV-Soozi Brooks6161250
2CV-LLW-Jill Mendoza6363872
3CV-Megan Korte4040128
4CV-Francoise Moran4141238
5CV-Jenn Charron/Alex Ricardson4343765
6CV-Jamie Bell2222440
7CV-Brooke Russo1111321
8CV-Julie Vila0303639
9CV-Alice Santos05051058

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Julie Vila
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Vila
7W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.