Teams

GoldenIsle/Pol

2025 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-06vs Pompano/FlanschaLost 14
L#1 DoublesAriel Fleichman / Andres Rosenfeld vs Cody Wall / David Chalich1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMartin Pollon vs Brian Kares6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCaue Toledo Leite De Carvalho / Carlos Navarro vs Mark Blum / Marcelo Chagas1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMATIAS DAJCZ vs Nick Flanscha5-7, 0-2
L#3 DoublesMartin Huffmann / Mariano Bendersky vs David Aizer / Paul Cassidy2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-04-29vs Sunrise/FlavellLost 12
W#1 DoublesMATIAS DAJCZ / Andres Rosenfeld vs George Flavell / Michael Krauss6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMartin Pollon / Caue Toledo Leite De Carvalho vs Daniel Young / Paul Muldoon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMartin Huffmann / Ariel Fleichman vs James McCann / James OBrien1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Arie Geller
published 4
3.81
Isaac Korn
published
3.80
Caue Toledo Leite De Carvalho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Mariano Bendersky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Andres Rosenfeld
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
MATIAS DAJCZ
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.70
John Cogan
published
3.61
Hernando Gonzalez
published
3.58
Nicolas Gershanik
published
3.56
Martin Pollon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.44
Carlos Navarro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Ariel Fleichman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Martin Huffmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andres Rosenfeld + MATIAS DAJCZ4154% games+0.3% vs expected
Carlos Navarro + Caue Toledo Leite De Carvalho2439% games−9.7% vs expected
Hernando Gonzalez + Martin Pollon033 matchesnot enough data
Mariano Bendersky + John Cogan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arie Geller
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Isaac Korn
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Caue Toledo Leite De Carvalho
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Mariano Bendersky
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Andres Rosenfeld
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
MATIAS DAJCZ
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
John Cogan
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Hernando Gonzalez
10W–36L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Nicolas Gershanik
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.58
Martin Pollon
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.56
3.5
Carlos Navarro
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
4
Ariel Fleichman
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Martin Huffmann
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.